Case LawHigh Court › Gopal Vijaykumar v. The Commissioner Of...

Gopal Vijaykumar v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals

High Court 05 Nov 2024 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Gopal Vijaykumar v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals
Date of order
05 Nov 2024
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Gopal Vijaykumar v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals, the High Court (2024) decided the matter.

Decision: Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 05.11.2024 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ W.P. No.35130 of 2023 andW.M.P. Nos.35115 and 35120 of 2023 Gopal Vijaykumar ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Income Tax Department, New Delhi. 2.Assessment Unit, Income Tax Department, New Delhi. ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records relating to the issuance of appellate order bearing DIN and Order No.ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2023-24/1056291473(1) dated 20.09.2023 passed by the 1st Respondent herein and quash the same. For Petitioner : Ms.P.S.Sri Harini For Respondents : Dr.B.Ramaswamy Senior Standing Cousel W.P. No.35130 of 2023 ORDER The present writ petition has been filed challenging the impugned order of the First Appellate Authority dated 20.09.2023 on the limited ground that the impugned order has been filed without granting the petitioner an opportunity of hearing and thus is contrary to the mandate contained in Section 250(1) and (2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act"). 2. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that no hearing notices were issued and would also take this Court through the order to indicate that there is not even a whisper of the hearing notice for the personal hearing was actually issued. 3. To the contrary, the learned Senior Standing Counsel for the Respondents would submit that notice under Section 256 of the Act was issued on various dates and petitioner also filed written submissions and would further submit that the order is in compliance with the mandate contained in Section 250 of the Act. 4. I am afraid that Section 250 of the Act expressly provides for a personal hearing and there is nothing on record to indicate that an opportunity of personal https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P. No.35130 of 2023 hearing was in fact granted. Therefore, the impugned order is set aside on the limited ground that the assessing authority has proceeded to pass the impugned order without granting personal hearing. The matter is remanded back to the assessing authority to re-hear the matter and pass orders afresh after granting the petitioner an opportunity of hearing in accordance with law and in particular Section 250 of the Act. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. 05.11.2024 Speaking (or) Non Speaking OrderIndex : Yes/ NoNeutral Citation: Yes/Nomka To: 1.The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Income Tax Department, New Delhi. 2.Assessment Unit, Income Tax Department, New Delhi. W.P. No.35130 of 2023 MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ, J. mka W.P. No.35130 of 2023 05.11.2024
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Defend a reassessment (Sec 148) notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan