Case LawHigh Court › Gopika Organiser - Applicant(S v. Commis...

Gopika Organiser - Applicant(S v. Commissioner Of Income Tax - Respondent(S

High Court 09 Jan 2006 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · gujarathc
Parties
Gopika Organiser - Applicant(S v. Commissioner Of Income Tax - Respondent(S
Date of order
09 Jan 2006
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Gopika Organiser - Applicant(S v. Commissioner Of Income Tax - Respondent(S, the High Court (2006) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Reference stands disposed of accordingly.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
ITR/262/1995 IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD INCOME TAX REFERENCE No. 262 of 1995 For Approval and Signature: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.A.MEHTA HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE H.N.DEVANI ============================================================== 1[Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed ]to see the judgment ?2To be referred to the Reporter or not ?3[Whether their Lordships wish to see the fair copy ]of the judgment ?Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the 4constitution of India, 1950 or any order made thereunder ?5[Whether it is to be circulated to the civil judge ]? ============================================================== GOPIKA ORGANISER - Applicant(s)VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - Respondent(s) ============================================================== Appearance :SERVED BY RPAD - (N)for Applicant(s) : 1,MR MANISH R BHATT for Respondent(s) : 1,================================================================== CORAM :HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.A.MEHTAandHONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE H.N.DEVANI Date : 09/01/2006 ORAL JUDGMENT (Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.A.MEHTA) ITR/262/1995 2/2JUDGMENT 1 Despite service of notice there is no appearance on behalf of the applicant, nor has the applicant filed Paper Book as required by the Rules of this High Court. 2 In these circumstances, the Reference is left unanswered for want of prosecution. Reference stands disposed of accordingly. (D.A.Mehta,J) (H.N.Devani,J) m.m.bhatt
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan