Gopiram Ramprasad Chauhan v. Income Tax Commissioner Income Tax Department Vyapar Vihar Bilaspurchhattisgarhchhattisgarh

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPURWPT No. 248 of 2018 Gopiram Ramprasad Chauhan, s/o. Late Ramprasad Chouhan, Aged About 65Years R/o Naya Risda Bhadrapara ,ward No. 36 ,balco Nagar ,district KorbaChhattisgarh. ---- Petitioner Versus 1. Income Tax Commissioner Income Tax Department Vyapar Vihar BilaspurChhattisgarhChhattisgarh 2. Asisstant Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle, Korba, District Korba C.G. ---- Respondents ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For PetitionerFor Respondents :Mr. Sourabh Sharma, Advocate:Ms. Naushina Afrin Ali, Advocate ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri 01.05.2019 Order On Board Heard 1.Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the bank account of the petitionerhas been freezed under the direction of the Income Tax Department wherein heuses to receive his monthly pension, therefore, it is difficult for him to survive.has been freezed under the direction of the Income Tax Department wherein heuses to receive his monthly pension, therefore, it is difficult for him to survive. 2.It is stated that he has made a representation vide Annexure P/3. Therefore, therespondents may be directed to decide the same within a reasonable time.respondents may be directed to decide the same within a reasonable time. 3.Taking into the position of the petitioner, it is directed that the respondents shallconsider and decide the representation of the petitioner (Annexure P/3) dated17.07.2017 which is pending, within a period of six weeks from the date ofpresentation of copy of this order. The liberty is further given to the petitioner thatif so advised, he may file a fresh representation in detail along with the copy ofthis order within two weeks. In case a fresh representation is made, theconsider and decide the representation of the petitioner (Annexure P/3) dated17.07.2017 which is pending, within a period of six weeks from the date ofpresentation of copy of this order. The liberty is further given to the petitioner thatif so advised, he may file a fresh representation in detail along with the copy ofthis order within two weeks. In case a fresh representation is made, the respondents shall decide the same within a further period of six weeks from thedate of receipt of such representation. 4.With such observations, the petition stands disposed of. Sd/- ( Goutam Bhaduri )Judge