Gouri Pillai v. The Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
01 Dec 2016 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Gouri Pillai v. The Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
01 Dec 2016
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Gouri Pillai v. The Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Hence, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
In the High Court of Judicature at Madras
Dated : 01.12.2016
Coram :
The Honourable Mr.Justice T.S.SIVAGNANAM
Writ Petition No.37477 of 2016
Gouri Pillai
Vs
...Petitioner
1.The Chief Commissioner of Income Tax, No.121, Mahatma Gandhi Road, Chennai-34.
2.The Income Tax Officer, Business Range XV(1), Chennai-34. Range XV(1), Chennai-34.
3.The Director of Grievances, Central Board of Direct Taxes, Central Secretariat, New Delhi-110001.
...Respondents
PETITION under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing respondents 1 and 2 to take action on the representation of the petitioner dated 17.4.2014 as directed by the third respondent within a time limit to be stipulated by this Court.
For Petitioner :Mr.R.ParthibanFor Respondents :Mrs.Hema Muralikrishnan, SPC
ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition. He has also made an endorsement in the bundle today to that effect.
2. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.
Internet : Yes
01.12.2016
To
1.The Chief Commissioner of Income Tax, No.121, Mahatma Gandhi Road, Chennai-34. Road, Chennai-34.
2.The Income Tax Officer, Business Range XV(1), Chennai-34.
3.The Director of Grievances, Central Board of Direct Taxes, Central Secretariat, New Delhi-110001. Secretariat, New Delhi-110001.
WP.No.37477 of 2016http://www.judis.nic.in
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue