Case LawHigh Court › Govindan Chokkappan v. The Income Tax Of...

Govindan Chokkappan v. The Income Tax Officer,Non Corporate Ward 2(1

High Court 30 Jan 2017 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · mdubench
Parties
Govindan Chokkappan v. The Income Tax Officer,Non Corporate Ward 2(1
Date of order
30 Jan 2017
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Govindan Chokkappan v. The Income Tax Officer,Non Corporate Ward 2(1, the High Court (2017) decided the matter.

Decision: It is needless tostate that if the amount is not paid by the Petitioner within thespecified time, it is open to the authorities concerned to proceedfurther on the basis of the impugned order. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 4.With the above direction, the Writ Petition is disposed of.C...

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURTDATED: 30.01.2017CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN W.M.P(MD)Nos.1171 and 1172 of 2017 Govindan Chokkappan... Petitioner Vs. The Income Tax Officer,Non Corporate Ward 2(1), C.R.Buildings, VP.Rathnasamy Nadar Road,Madurai – 625 002. Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution ofIndia for issuance of a writ of Certiorari calling for the recordsof the respondent in PAN. /1/2014-15 and to quash the orderdated 29.12.2016 passed therein. This Writ Petition has been filed, seeking for issuance of awrit of Certiorari calling for the records of the respondent inPAN.AADPC4278P/1/2014-15 and to quash the order dated 29.12.2016passed therein. 2.Mr.R.Krishnamoorthy, learned Senior Standing Counsel takesnotice for the respondent. By consent of both parties, the WritPetition itself is taken up for final disposal at the admissionstage itself. 3.Taking note of the submissions, it is seen that there aredisputed question facts involved in this matter,therefore, thePetitioner is permitted to file an appeal, subject to the conditionthat he deposits 10% of the amount additional demanded videimpugned order, dated 29.12.2016 within 15 days from today and onsuch deposit, the appeal shall be entertained and disposed of withinperiod of four weeks thereafter, without adjourning the matterbeyond seven working days at any point of time. It is needless tostate that if the amount is not paid by the Petitioner within thespecified time, it is open to the authorities concerned to proceedfurther on the basis of the impugned order. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 4.With the above direction, the Writ Petition is disposed of.Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed. Nocosts.Sd/-Assistant Registrar(CS-I) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To: The Income Tax Officer,Non Corporate Ward02(1),C.R.Buildings, VP.Rathnasamy Nadar Road,Madurai – 625 002. +3cc to Mr.Gnanasekaran,Advocate, SR No.4819+1cc to R.Subramanian,Advocate, SR No.5133 vsnms/rsk/8.2.2017/2p.6c W.P.(MD) No.1425 of 2017 and W.M.P(MD)Nos.1171 and 1172 of 201730.01.2017
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan