Case Law › High Court › Grand Magnum Terra Firma Private Limited...

Grand Magnum Terra Firma Private Limited v. The Income Tax Officer

High Court 24 Sep 2024 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Grand Magnum Terra Firma Private Limited v. The Income Tax Officer
Date of order
24 Sep 2024
Assessment year(s)
2014-2015, 2014-15
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Grand Magnum Terra Firma Private Limited v. The Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2024) decided the matter.

Decision: The Writ Petition stands disposed of with the above observations and directions.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

W.P.No.10010 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 24.09.2024 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN W.P.No.10010 of 2022 and W.M.P.Nos.9713 and 9714 of 2022 Grand Magnum Terra Firma Private Limited,Represented by Mr.Suyash Surana, Director,No.59, Erulappan Street, Sowcarpet,Chennai – 600 079. Vs. ... Petitioner 1. The Income Tax Officer, Corporate Ward 2(2), No.121, M.G.Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai – 600 034. 2. The Additional/Joint/Deputy/Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax/Income Tax Officer, National Faceless Assessment, Delhi. ... Respondents Prayer:Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records of the Respondents contained in their notice bearing DIN & Notice No.ITBA/AST.S/148/2020-21/1032099822(1), dated 31.03.2021 issued by the 1[st] Respondent under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, for PAN: for Assessment Year 2014-2015 and all proceedings in furtherance thereof, including the assessment order bearing DIN: W.P.No.10010 of 2022 ITBA/AST/S/147/2021-22/1042278640(1) dated 31.03.2022 passed by the 2[nd] Respondent under Section 147 r/w Section 144B of the Income Tax Act, 1961, for PAN: for Assessment Year 2014-2015 and to quash the same as arbitrary, illegal and unjust, and to consequently forbear the Respondents or their superiors, subordinates, agents etc. from re-assessing the Petitioner's income for the assessment year 2014-15 under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. For Petitioner: Mr.Suhrith ParthasarathyFor Respondents: Mr.B.Ramanakumar Senior Standing Counsel ORDER Heard the learned counsel for the Petitioner and the learned Senior Standing Counsel for the Respondents. 2. The Petitioner has challenged the Impugned Notice dated 31.03.2021 issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the Assessment Year 2014-2015. 3. The reasons for reopening the assessment was supplied to the Petitioner on 19.03.2022. The Petitioner has also replied to the same on 24.03.2022. However, the Respondents proceeded to pass a speaking Order vide Order dated 26.03.2022 following the Assessment Order dated 31.03.2022. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis____________Page No. 2 of 6 W.P.No.10010 of 2022 4. Having considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for the Petitioner and the learned Senior Standing Counsel for the Respondents, it is evident that the Assessment Order has been passed on 31.03.2021 to ensure that the assessment does not gets time barred. 5. The Respondents cannot be found fault as they are bound to comply with the statutory period of limitation prescribed under Section 151 of the Act. However, the Petitioner cannot be penalized merely because the Respondents are acting under time constrain. 6. There is a clear case of violation of Principles of Natural Justice. Therefore, Impugned Order dated 26.03.2022 disposing of the Petitioner's objection for reopening of the assessment and the consequential Order dated 31.03.2022. Therefore, the Orders are quashed and the case is remitted back to the Respondent to pass fresh Order. Needless to state that the limitation for passing Order stands protected. W.P.No.10010 of 2022 passed shall be passed in strict compliance of the directions of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of GKN Driveshafts (India) Ltd. vs. Income Tax Officer, 259 ITR 19 (SC). It is open for the Petitioner to request the Respondents to furnish the documents which have been referred to the Communication dated 19.03.2022 giving reasons for reopening the assessment. 8. The Writ Petition stands disposed of with the above observations and directions. No cost. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. 24.09.2024 Index : Yes/NoSpeaking/Non-speaking OrderNeutral Citation :Yes/Norgm To W.P.No.10010 of 2022 passed shall be passed in strict compliance of the directions of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of GKN Driveshafts (India) Ltd. vs. Income Tax Officer, 259 ITR 19 (SC). It is open for the Petitioner to request the Respondents to furnish the documents which have been referred to the Communication dated 19.03.2022 giving reasons for reopening the assessment. 8. The Writ Petition stands disposed of with the above observations and directions. No cost. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. 24.09.2024 Index : Yes/NoSpeaking/Non-speaking OrderNeutral Citation :Yes/Norgm To 1. The Income Tax Officer, Corporate Ward 2(2), No.121, M.G.Road, Nungambakkam, W.P.No.10010 of 2022 Chennai – 600 034. 2. The Additional/Joint/Deputy/Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax/Income Tax Officer, National Faceless Assessment, Delhi. C.SARAVANAN, J. rgm https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis____________Page No. 5 of 6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis____________Page No. 6 of 6 W.P.No.10010 of 2022 W.P.No.10010 of 2022andW.M.P.Nos.9713 and 9714 of 2022 24.09.2024
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Defend a reassessment (Sec 148) notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan