Case LawHigh Court › Greater Mohali Area Development Authorit...

Greater Mohali Area Development Authority, Puda Bhawan, Mohali v. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ii, Chandigarh And Another

High Court 05 Dec 2017 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
Greater Mohali Area Development Authority, Puda Bhawan, Mohali v. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ii, Chandigarh And Another
Date of order
05 Dec 2017
Assessment year(s)
2014-15
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Greater Mohali Area Development Authority, Puda Bhawan, Mohali v. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ii, Chandigarh And Another, the High Court (2017) decided the matter.

Decision: 3.In view of the above, writ petition has been renderedinfructuous and is disposed of as such.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
CWP No.26451 of 2017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.26451 of 2017 Date of decision:05.12.2017 Greater Mohali Area Development Authority, PUDA Bhawan, Mohali ... Petitioner Vs. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-II, Chandigarh and another ... Respondents CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTALHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL Present:-Ms. Radhika Suri, Senior Advocate with Mr. Manpreet Singh Kanda, Advocatefor the petitioner. Ms. Urvashi Dhugga, Advocatefor the respondent-revenue AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. (ORAL) 1.In this writ petition filed under Articles 226/227 of theConstitution of India, the petitioner has prayed for issuance of a writ in thenature of certiorari for quashing the order dated 08.11.2017 (Annexure P-5),whereby, the stay order granted for assessment years 2013-14 and 2014-15,during the pendency of the appeal before Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals)-II, Chandigarh [for short “CIT(A)”], has been revoked. 2.At the outset, learned counsel for the respondent-revenue oninstructions from Mr. Kultej Bains, Additional Commissioner of IncomeTax, Range 6, Mohali stated that the attachment order dated 08.11.2017 (Annexure P-5) passed by respondent No.2 for recovery of tax for theassessment year 2014-15, in pursuance to the demand notice issued underSection 156 of Income Tax Act, 1961, has been withdrawn and further thestay granted by the assessing officer for the assessment year 2014-15 shallcontinue till the decision of the appeal by the CIT(A). It was also stated thatrecovery shall not be made for a period of one week more from the date ofreceipt of certified copy of the order, in case any adverse order is passedpassed by the said appellate authority. 3.In view of the above, writ petition has been renderedinfructuous and is disposed of as such. (AJAY KUMAR MITTAL)JUDGE December 05, 2017savita (AMIT RAWAL)JUDGE Whether Speaking/ReasonedWhether Reportable Yes/NoYes/No
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan