Case LawHigh Court › Gulam Nabi R. Tanwar v. The Assistant Co...

Gulam Nabi R. Tanwar v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Ward 10(3

High Court 16 Sep 2011 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Gulam Nabi R. Tanwar v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Ward 10(3
Date of order
16 Sep 2011
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Gulam Nabi R. Tanwar v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Ward 10(3, the High Court (2011) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2643 OF 2011 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.777 OF 2011 Gulam Nabi R. Tanwar VersusThe Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Ward 10(3) ..Appellant. ..Respondent. Mr.P.P. Pandit with Mr.P.P. Prabhu for the appellant.Mr.Suresh Kumar for the respondent. CORAM : J.P. Devadhar &K.K. Tated, JJ. P.C. : DATE : 16th September 2011 1.This Notice of Motion is taken out seeking condonation of 1309 days delay in filing the appeal. 2.The assessee had filed Income Tax Appeal No.2764 of 2009 to challenge the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal dated 7[th] November 2007. That appeal was allowed to be withdrawn by order dated 4[th] February 2010 with liberty to the appellant to take appropriate proceedings as is permissible in law. Thereafter, the assessee has taken out present Notice of Motion belatedly on 7[th] September 2011. In our opinion, the reasons set out in the affidavit in support of the Notice of Motion cannot be said to be sufficient cause for condoning the delay. 3.However, in the facts and circumstances of the present case, the delay is condoned, subject to payment of cost of Rs.5,000/- to be paid by the appellant to the respondent within two weeks from today. 4.Subject to payment of cost as condition precedent, the Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). (K.K. Tated, J.) (J.P. Devadhar, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan