Gupta International v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Karnal
High Court
20 Jul 2011 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
Gupta International v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Karnal
Date of order
20 Jul 2011
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Gupta International v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Karnal, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA ATCHANDIGARH.
ITA No.174 of 2011
Date of decision: 20.7.2011
Gupta International
-----Appellant
Vs.
Commissioner of Income Tax, Karnal
----Respondent
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOELACTING CHIEF JUSTICEHON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL
Present:- Mr. Rishabh Kapoor, Advocate for the appellant.
Adarsh Kumar Goel, ACJ.
This order will dispose of ITA Nos.174 and 175 of 2011 asboth the appeals involve common questions of law.
ITA No.174 of 2011 has been preferred by the assessee under
Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order of ITAT Delhi“C” Bench in ITA No.2656/Delhi/2008 dated 10.7.2009 for the assessmentyear 2002-03 raising following substantial questions of law:-
“a) Whether on the true and correct interpretation of theprovisions of section 80HHC read with section 80IA(9) readwith section 80IB(13) the Tribunal has erred in restricting theclaim of deductions under the Act?
b) Whether the provisions of Taxation Laws (Amendment) Act,2005 by bringing third and fourth proviso to section 80HHCretrospectively are unconstitutional and against Article 14, 19(1)(g) of the Constitution and needs to be quashed?
c) Whether on the true and correct interpretation of theprovisions of section 148 the same are applicable in a casewhere a substantive provision has been brought in the statuteretrospectively?
Learned counsel for the appellant-assessee fairly states thatmatter is covered against the assessee by order of this Court dated18.4.2011 in ITA No.469 of 2010, Asin Exim International v.Commissioner of Income Tax, Jalandhar, Punjab wherein it was held thatif deduction under Section 80IA has been taken, deduction under Section80HHC was not admissible in view of Section 80IB(13) read with Section80IA(9) of the Act, following earlier judgment of this Court in FriendsCastings (P) Limited v. Commissioner of Income Tax, (2011) 50 DTRJudgments 61.
In view of above, no substantial question of law arises. Theappeals are dismissed.
(Adarsh Kumar Goel)Acting Chief Justice
July 20, 2011‘gs’
(Ajay Kumar Mittal) Judge
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.