Gurinderjit Singh v. Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax & Anr
High Court
30 Oct 2019 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
Gurinderjit Singh v. Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax & Anr
Date of order
30 Oct 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Gurinderjit Singh v. Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax & Anr, the High Court (2019) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
Date of decision: 30.10.2019
1. ITA No. 330 of 2019 (O&M)
Gurinderjit Singh
.....Appellant
Vs.
PR. Commissioner of Income Tax & Anr.
...Respondents
2. ITA No. 315 of 2019 (O&M)
Kesar Singh.....Appellant
Vs.
PR. Commissioner of Income Tax & Anr.
...Respondents
3. ITA No. 316 of 2019 (O&M)
Kesar Singh
.....Appellant
Vs.
PR. Commissioner of Income Tax & Anr.
...Respondents
4. ITA No. 317 of 2019 (O&M)
Kesar Singh
.....Appellant
Vs.
PR. Commissioner of Income Tax & Anr.
...Respondents
5. ITA No. 325 of 2019 (O&M)
Gurinderjit Singh
.....Appellant
Vs.
PR. Commissioner of Income Tax & Anr.
...Respondents
6. ITA No. 327 of 2019 (O&M)
Gurinderyjit Singh
.....Appellant
Vs.
PR. Commissioner of Income Tax & Anr.
...Respondents
7. 1TA No. 329 of 2019 (O&M)
Kesar SinghVs.
.....Appellant
PR. Commissioner of Income Tax & Anr.
...Respondents
8. ITA No. 345 of 2019 (O&M)
Kesar Singh.....Appellant
Vs.
PR. Commissioner of Income Tax & Anr.
...Respondents
9. ITA No. 390 of 2019 (O&M)
Gurinderyjit Singh
.....Appellant
Vs.
PR. Commissioner of Income Tax & Anr....Respondents
CORAM:|HON’BLE MR. JUSTICK AJAY TEWARIHON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN
Present: Mr. Salil Kapoor, Advocate, and|Mr. Shivansh Pandya, Advocate, for the appellant(s).
AJAY TEWARI, J. (Oral)
CM No. 15342-CIT of 2019 in ITA No. 330 of 2019
For the reasons mentioned in the application, delay of 47 days in
filing the appeal is condoned.
Application stands disposed of.
ITA No. 330 of 2019 (O&M) & connected cases
C.M No. 14977-ClIl]I of 2019 in ITA No. 315 of 2C.M No. 14978-CIT of 2019 in ITA No. 316 of 2019C.M No. 16018-CII of 2019 in ITA No. 345 of 2019
For the reasons mentioned in the applications, delay of 89 days in
filing the appeals is condoned.
Applications stand disposed of.
C.M No. 15004-CITI of 2019 in ITA No. 317 of 201
For the reasons mentioned in the application, delay of 56 days in
filing the appeal is condoned.
Application stands disposed of.
C.M No. 15136-CIlI of 2019 in ITA No. 325 of 201C.M No. 15138-ClII of 2019 in ITA No. 327 of 201
For the reasons mentioned in the application, delay of 48 days in
filing the appeal is condoned.
Application stands disposed of.
C.M No. 15337-ClIlI of 2019 in ITA No. 329 of 20
For the reasons mentioned in the application, delay of 55 days in
filing the appeal is condoned.
Application stands disposed of.
C.M No. 17848-CIT of 2019 in ITA No. 390 of 2019
For the reasons mentioned in the application, delay of 58 days in
filing the appeal is condoned.
Application stands disposed of.
Main Appeals
This order shall dispose above-numbered appeals preferred by the
the Assesses under section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short “theAct’) against order dated 29.08.2018 (Annexure A-10) passed by the Income Tax
Appellate Tribunal, Division Bench A, Chandigarh (hereinafter referred to as “the
Tribunal’) in Cross Objection Nos.66 to 69/Chd./2017 for Assessment Year19994-95 to 1997-98
Above-mentioned appeals have been filed against orders of theIncome-tax Appellate Tribunal, Chandigarh, upholding the assessment.
Apart trom the merits, learned counsel has raised the issue thatagainst the impugned order assessee had filed miscellaneous applications anddespite the fact that arguments were heard on 07.08.2019, no orders have beenpassed thereon as almost three months have been lapsed,
In these circumstances, we deem it appropriate to dispose of above-numbered appeals at this stage, without going into the merits and with a request tothe Tribunal to make an endeavor to decide miscellaneous applicationsexpeditiously.
(AJAY TEWARIT
JUDGE
October 30, 2019tripti
(ALKA SARIN)JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/NoWhether Reportable: Yes/No
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.