Case LawHigh Court › H C Fruits Limited v. Asst. Commissioner...

H C Fruits Limited v. Asst. Commissioner Of Income Tax

High Court 28 Jan 2020 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · gujarathc
Parties
H C Fruits Limited v. Asst. Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
28 Jan 2020
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In H C Fruits Limited v. Asst. Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2020) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/TAX APPEAL NO. 521 of 2008 ================================================================ H C FRUITS LIMITED Versus ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ================================================================ Appearance: MRS SWATI SOPARKAR(870) for the Appellant(s) No. 1MRS MAUNA M BHATT(174) for the Opponent(s) No. 1 ================================================================ CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE J.B.PARDIWALA and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BHARGAV D. KARIA Date : 28/01/2020 ORAL ORDER (PER : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE J.B.PARDIWALA) Mr. Bandis Soparkar, the learned counsel appearingfor the appellant submits that he has instructions from hisclient not to press this tax appeal on the substantialquestion of law framed by the Court at the time ofadmission of the appeal. According to Mr. Soparkar, theadjudication on the substantial question of law formulatedby this Court while admitting the appeal would remain anacademic question, more particularly, keeping in mind thatsubstantial relief has been granted by the Assessing Officerin the remand proceedings. In view of the aforesaid, this tax appeal standsdisposed of accordingly. (J. B. PARDIWALA, J) Vahid (BHARGAV D. KARIA, J)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan