Case LawHigh Court › H C Shah & Others v. Commissioner Of Inc...

H C Shah & Others v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax

High Court 04 Feb 2004 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · gujarathc
Parties
H C Shah & Others v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax
Date of order
04 Feb 2004
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In H C Shah & Others v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax, the High Court (2004) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD INCOME TAX REFERENCE No 36 of 1994 ���with ITR Nos. 38/94, 39/94, 49/94, 53/94, 54/94, 59/94, 203/94, 216/94, 217/94, 244/94, 70/95, 71/95, 129/95 and 243/95. For Approval and Signature: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.S.SHAH and HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.KAPADIA ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the concerned : NO Magistrate/Magistrates,Judge/Judges,Tribunal/Tribunals? -------------------------------------------------------------- H C SHAH & OTHERS Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR SN SOPARKAR for Petitioners MR MANISH R BHATT for Respondents -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.S.SHAH and HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.KAPADIA COMMON ORAL JUDGEMENT �(Per : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.S.SHAH) �Mr. Saurabh Soparkar, learned counsel for the petitioners - assessees, states that he has instructions not to pursue the references hence seeks leave to place on record the letter dated January 28, 2004 from the beneficiaries of the Trusts in question. �Leave as prayed for is granted. These references are disposed of as not pressed. �We accordingly decline to answer the questions referred for our opinion. �The references accordingly stand disposed of. ����(M.S. Shah, J.) ����(A.M. Kapadia, J.) ��--- (karan)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan