Handfab India, Mahavir Colony,Panipat v. Income Tax Officer,Ward-3, Panipat And Others
High Court
22 Feb 2013 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
Handfab India, Mahavir Colony,Panipat v. Income Tax Officer,Ward-3, Panipat And Others
Date of order
22 Feb 2013
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Handfab India, Mahavir Colony,Panipat v. Income Tax Officer,Ward-3, Panipat And Others, the High Court (2013) decided the matter.
Decision: Pankaj Jain and Mr.D.K.Goyal,Advocates, for the petitioner Sarvshri Yogesh Putney, Rajesh Katoch and Ms.Savita Saxena, Senior Standing Counselsfor the respondents A.K.SIKRI, CJ: (Oral) This writ petition is disposed of in terms of the order of even date recorded in CWP No.1335 of 2008 titled as Prik...
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
CWP No. 20845 of 2008
Date of Decision: 22.2.2013
Handfab India, Mahavir Colony,Panipat
Vs.
--Petitioner
Income Tax Officer,Ward-3, Panipat and others
--Respondents
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.SIKRI, CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN
Present:Mr. Pankaj Jain and Mr.D.K.Goyal,Advocates, for the petitioner
Sarvshri Yogesh Putney, Rajesh Katoch and Ms.Savita Saxena, Senior Standing Counselsfor the respondents
A.K.SIKRI, CJ: (Oral)
This writ petition is disposed of in terms of the order of even
date recorded in CWP No.1335 of 2008 titled as Priknit Exports,B-
XXV/539/A/10,G.T Road Jalandhar Vs. Assistant Commissioner of
Income Tax Central Circle-III Ludhiana and others.
(A.K.SIKRI)
CHIEFJUSTICE
(RAKESH KUMAR JAIN ) JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.