Hans Peter Gasser v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax
High Court
25 Nov 2004 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · gujarathc
Parties
Hans Peter Gasser v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax
Date of order
25 Nov 2004
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Hans Peter Gasser v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax, the High Court (2004) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Issue: Whether it is to be circulated to the concerned : NO Magistrate/Magistrates,Judge/Judges,Tribunal/Tribunals? -------------------------------------------------------------- HANS PETER GASSERVersus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: 1.
Decision: The Reference stands disposed of accordingly.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
INCOME TAX REFERENCE No 199 of 1991
For Approval and Signature:
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE D.A.MEHTA
and
HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE H.N.DEVANI
============================================================
1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the concerned : NO Magistrate/Magistrates,Judge/Judges,Tribunal/Tribunals? -------------------------------------------------------------- HANS PETER GASSERVersus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
-------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: 1. INCOME TAX REFERENCE No. 199 of 1991 MR JP SHAH with Mr.Manish J.Shah for applicant-assessee. Mr. Pranav Raval for Mr.D.D.Vyas, Sr. Advocate and Mrs.M.M.Bhatt for the respondent-revenue. --------------------------------------------------------------
CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE D.A.MEHTA
and
HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE H.N.DEVANI
(Per : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE D.A.MEHTA)
�As the questions referred emanate out of the common order of the Tribunal dated 28th May, 1990 and there is a consensus amongst the learned Advocates for the respective parties that the facts and submissions are identical to those stated in Income-tax Reference no.192 of 1991, it is not necessary to repeat the same and for the reasons stated in our judgment and order rendered today in ITR 192 of 1991, we decline to answer the questions, and direct the Tribunal to decide the issue between the parties for the reasons stated in the said judgment. The Reference stands disposed of accordingly. There shall be no order as to costs.
����(D.A.Mehta,J.)
����(Ms. H.N.Devani,J.)
stanley-dam.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.