Hardeep Singh v. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals),Chandigarh & Anr
High Court
17 May 2019 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
Hardeep Singh v. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals),Chandigarh & Anr
Date of order
17 May 2019
Assessment year(s)
2011-12
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Hardeep Singh v. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals),Chandigarh & Anr, the High Court (2019) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
218IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANAAT CHANDIGARH
(CCW P-8189-2Decided on: 17.05.2019
Hardeep Singh
—___ Petitioner
Versus
Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals),Chandigarh & anr.
...... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTALHON'BLE MRS, JUSTICE MANJARI NEHRU KAUL
Present :Mr. Dixit Garg, Advocate for|Mr. Aman Bansal, Advocatefor the petitioner.
Mr. Yogesh Putney, Advocate andMr. Ajiteshwar Singh, Advocatefor the respondents,
5555
Ajay Kumar Mtttal, J.
Prayer in the instant writ petition filed under Article 226 of theConstitution of India is for issuance of writ in the nature of Certiorari forsetting aside the impugned order dated 14.03.2019 (Annexure P-11) andnotice dated 19.02.2019 (Annexure P-8) passed by respondent No.2 and allother consequential proceedings arising therefrom.
?DLearned counsel for the respondents has produced acommunication dated 25.04.2018 issued by respondent No.2 and submittedthat during the pendency of writ petition on deposit of 20% of totaloutstanding demand for the assessment year 2011-12 1.e. Ly8,68,300/-, theinterim stay has been granted till the disposal of the appeal, which ispending before the learned CIT(A)-2, Chandigarh. The said communication1s taken on record.
3In view of the above, learned counsel for the petitionersubmitted that the present petition has become infructuous and may bedisposed of as such.
4Ordered accordingly.
(AJAY KUMAR MITTAL)JUDGE
17.05.2019sonia
(MANJARI NEHRU KAUL)JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned:Whether reportable:
Yes/NoYes/No
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.