In Haresh v. Central Public Information Officer & Incometax Officer & 3 Other(S, the High Court (2019) decided the matter.
Decision: Accordingly, the appeal is disposed of as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
C/LPA/613/2016 ORDER
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 613 of 2016In R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4479 of 2016
==========================================================
HARESH S/O. PARMANAND ALWANI VersusCENTRAL PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER & INCOMETAX OFFICER & 3 other(s)
==========================================================
Appearance:MR SAMIR AFZAL KHAN(3733) for the Appellant(s) No. 1MRS MAUNA M BHATT(174) for the Respondent(s) No. 2NOTICE SERVED(4) for the Respondent(s) No. 1,3,4
==========================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.M.CHHAYAandHONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.N. KARIA
Date : 14/08/2019 ORAL ORDER(PER : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.M.CHHAYA)
Mr. Samir Afzal Khan, learned advocate for the appellant does not press this appeal in view of the communication dated 29.9.2017. Accordingly, the appeal is disposed of as withdrawn.
(R.M.CHHAYA, J)
MRP
(B.N. KARIA, J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue