Harjiv Singh v. Asst. Commissioner Of Income Tax & Anr
High Court
10 Jul 2019 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Harjiv Singh v. Asst. Commissioner Of Income Tax & Anr
Date of order
10 Jul 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Harjiv Singh v. Asst. Commissioner Of Income Tax & Anr, the High Court (2019) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: In that view of the matter, the petition has been rendered infructuous and is disposed of as such.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
$~38
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 7314/2019
HARJIV SINGH
..... Petitioner
Through: Mr.Sachit Jolly with Mr.Aarush Bhatia, Advocates.
versus
ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX & ANR.
..... Respondents
Through: Mr.Ruchir Bhatia, Sr.Standing Counsel.
CORAM:JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH O R D E R% 10.07.2019
CM APPL. 30432/2019 (exemption)
1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
W.P.(C) 7314/2019 and CM APPL. 30431/2019 (stay)
2. Appearing on advance notice learned counsel for the Revenue placed before the Court a copy of the corrigendum dated 9[th] July 2019 withdrawing the order dated 20[th] June 2019 issued under Section 2(35) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 declaring the Petitioner as ‘Principal Officer’ for the purposes of Section 276B of the Act.
3. In that view of the matter, the petition has been rendered infructuous and is disposed of as such. Pending application is also dismissed.
S. MURALIDHAR, J.
JULY 10, 2019/tr
TALWANT SINGH, J.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue