Case Law › High Court › Harshdeep Singh Juneja v. State Of Chhat...

Harshdeep Singh Juneja v. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Police Station City Kotwali Raipur,District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.district Raipur, Chhattisgarh

High Court 11 Jun 2021 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · cghccisdb

Parties

Date of order

11 Jun 2021

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Harshdeep Singh Juneja v. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Police Station City Kotwali Raipur,District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.district Raipur, Chhattisgarh, the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal under Section 22 of the Income-tax Act. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

Section 22 case law →

The order — as passed by the High Court

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Proceedings through video conferencing MCRC No. 2735 of 2021 Harshdeep Singh Juneja, S/o Late Shri Mangat Singh Juneja, agedAbout 39 Years R/o Income Tax Colony, Raipur, Chhattisgarh.About 39 Years R/o Income Tax Colony, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ---- Applicant Versus State of Chhattisgarh Through Police Station City Kotwali Raipur,District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ---- Respondent -For ApplicantMs. Naushina Afrin Ali, Advocate.-For Respondent Shri Sudeep Agrawal, Dy. Advocate General. Hon'ble Shri Prashant Kumar Mishra Ag. Chief JusticeOrder On Board 11/06/2021 1. The applicant has preferred the second bail application under Section439 of the Cr.P.C., as he has been arrested in connection with CrimeNo.255/2020, registered at Police Station City Kotwali, District Raipur(C.G.) for the offence punishable under Sections 22(c), 25, 27 & 29 ofthe Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985.439 of the Cr.P.C., as he has been arrested in connection with CrimeNo.255/2020, registered at Police Station City Kotwali, District Raipur(C.G.) for the offence punishable under Sections 22(c), 25, 27 & 29 ofthe Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985. 2. Learned counsel for the applicant seeks permission of this Court towithdraw the bail application.withdraw the bail application. 3. Permission granted. 4. Accordingly, the bail application is dismissed as withdrawn. SD/- (Prashant Kumar Mishra) Acting Chief Justice Amardeep

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.