Harvindersingh Basantsingh Bindra v. Joint Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle 1 Aurangabad And Another
High Court
26 Jul 2018 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · hcaurdb
Parties
Harvindersingh Basantsingh Bindra v. Joint Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle 1 Aurangabad And Another
Date of order
26 Jul 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Harvindersingh Basantsingh Bindra v. Joint Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle 1 Aurangabad And Another, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: 3.We allow the civil application for amendment.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
955 WRIT PETITION NO. 8559 OF 2018
WITH CA/9615/2018 IN WP/8559/2018
HARVINDERSINGH BASANTSINGH BINDRA..PETITIONER
VERSUS
JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 1 AURANGABAD AND ANOTHER..RESPONDENTS
…
Mr. Raviraj R. Chandak, Advocate for the Petitioner.
Mr. Alok M. Sharma, Advocate for Respondent No.1.Mr. S. B. Deshpande, ASG for Respondent No.2UOI.
…
CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA &
SUNIL K. KOTWAL, JJ.
PER COURT:
DATED : 26[th] JULY, 2018.
1.It is submitted by Mr. Sharma, learned counsel for respondent no.1 that the assessment order is passed and the petitioner has challenged the same by filing appeal.
2.Mr. Chandak, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the assessment order is passed, even without waiting for four weeks period and all these facts are sought to be brought on record by way of an amendment.
3.We allow the civil application for amendment. The petitioner may carry out the
(2)
955wp85592018
amendment.
4.At the request of the petitioner, place the matter on 01.08.2018.
5.Civil Application is disposed.
(SUNIL K. KOTWAL) (S. V. GANGAPURWALA) JUDGE JUDGE
Devendra/July18
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.