Hasmukh Lalji Gogri And Anr v. Kotwal, Jj. Date :3[Rd] May 2019
High Court
03 May 2019 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Hasmukh Lalji Gogri And Anr v. Kotwal, Jj. Date :3[Rd] May 2019
Date of order
03 May 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Hasmukh Lalji Gogri And Anr v. Kotwal, Jj. Date :3[Rd] May 2019, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONWRIT PETITION NO.1188 OF 2019
Hasmukh Lalji Gogri and Anr...Petitioners VersusCommissioner of Income Tax & Ors...Respondents
Mr. Vijay M. Vaghela for petitionersNone for respondents.
CORAM:AKIL KURESHI &SARANG V. KOTWAL, JJ. DATE :3[rd] May 2019.
P.C.
Petitioners have alleged defaults and financialmismanagement by respondent Nos. 2 to 15, who are individualcitizens. The petitioners want income tax department to investigatethe dealings of such persons. The petitioners are simply pursuingtheir private wage against private respondents, for which they wishthe income tax machinery to be activated, that too, under the ordersand directions of Court. For obvious reasons, we are not inclined toaccept the petitioners' request. Petition dismissed.
(SARANG V. KOTWAL, J)
(AKIL KURESHI, J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue