In Hasmukhlal Ambaram Jariwala v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2001) decided the matter.
Issue: Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO -------------------------------------------------------------- HASMUKHLAL AMBARAM JARIWALA Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: 1.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
INCOME TAX REFERENCE No 187 of 1995
For Approval and Signature:
Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE M.S.SHAH
and
Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE D.A.MEHTA
============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO
-------------------------------------------------------------- HASMUKHLAL AMBARAM JARIWALA
Versus
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
-------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: 1. INCOME TAX REFERENCE No. 187 of 1995 MR GI DESAI for Petitioner No. 1 MR MANISH R BHATT for Respondent No. 1
--------------------------------------------------------------
CORAM : MR.JUSTICE M.S.SHAH
and
MR.JUSTICE D.A.MEHTA
Date of decision: 25/10/2001
(Per : MR.JUSTICE M.S.SHAH)
�Mr GI Desai learned counsel for the
applicant-assessee states that he has instructions not to
press the reference and seeks leave to produce the
written instruction by the petitioner in this behalf.
�Leave as prayed for is granted. In view of the
fact that the applicant-assessee does not press for this
reference, we decline to answer the question referred to
us.
�The Reference accordingly stands disposed of as
not pressed with no order as to costs.
�����(M.S. Shah,J)
�����(D.A. Mehta,J)
zgs/-
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.