Hata, Srinagar Road, Purnea (Bihar) Through One Of Its v. The Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Revenue Building, Bir
High Court
21 Jan 2013 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · patnahcucisdb94
Parties
Hata, Srinagar Road, Purnea (Bihar) Through One Of Its v. The Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Revenue Building, Bir
Date of order
21 Jan 2013
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Hata, Srinagar Road, Purnea (Bihar) Through One Of Its v. The Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Revenue Building, Bir, the High Court (2013) decided the matter.
Decision: In view of the above statement, the petition is disposed of.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNACivil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.21848 of 2011
======================================================
M/S Bolbum Construction, a partnership firm having its office at Sahiban
Hata, Srinagar Road, Purnea (Bihar) through one of its partner Sri Rakesh Raushan Kumar S/O Sri Praful Kumar Singh, Resident of Sahiban Hata, Srinagar Road, Purnea (Bihar).
.... .... Petitioner
Versus
1.The Chief Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Revenue Building, Bir
Chand Patel Marg, Patna.
2.The Commissioner of Income Tax, Bhagalpur.
3.The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Purnea Circle, Purnea.
4.The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1, Purnea Circle, Purnea.
.... .... Respondents
======================================================
Appearance :For the Petitioner :
Mr. Raj Kishore Prasad
Mr. Chiranjiv Ranjan
Mr. Tej Bahadur Roy, Advocates.
For the Respondents : Mr. Harshwardhan Prasad, Sr. S.C.
Mr. Rishi Raj Sinha, J. C. to Sr. S.C.
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAHORAL ORDER
(Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE)
Learned Senior Standing Counsel Mr. Harshwardhan
3
21-01-2013
Prasad appears for the respondent- Chief Commissioner of Income Tax. He states that he has received instructions to state that the amount of refund due to the petitioner and the statutory interest will be paid to the petitioner within one week from today.
In view of the above statement, the petition is disposed of.
In case, the respondent does not pay the amount of refund and the statutory interest within one week from today, the
Sujit/-
2 / 2
petitioner will have liberty to revive this Petition.
(R.M. Doshit, CJ)
(Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.