Case LawHigh Court › Hata, Srinagar Road, Purnea (Bihar) Thro...

Hata, Srinagar Road, Purnea (Bihar) Through One Of Its v. The Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Revenue Building, Bir

High Court 21 Jan 2013 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · patnahcucisdb94
Parties
Hata, Srinagar Road, Purnea (Bihar) Through One Of Its v. The Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Revenue Building, Bir
Date of order
21 Jan 2013
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Hata, Srinagar Road, Purnea (Bihar) Through One Of Its v. The Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Revenue Building, Bir, the High Court (2013) decided the matter.

Decision: In view of the above statement, the petition is disposed of.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNACivil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.21848 of 2011 ====================================================== M/S Bolbum Construction, a partnership firm having its office at Sahiban Hata, Srinagar Road, Purnea (Bihar) through one of its partner Sri Rakesh Raushan Kumar S/O Sri Praful Kumar Singh, Resident of Sahiban Hata, Srinagar Road, Purnea (Bihar). .... .... Petitioner Versus 1.The Chief Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Revenue Building, Bir Chand Patel Marg, Patna. 2.The Commissioner of Income Tax, Bhagalpur. 3.The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Purnea Circle, Purnea. 4.The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1, Purnea Circle, Purnea. .... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :For the Petitioner : Mr. Raj Kishore Prasad Mr. Chiranjiv Ranjan Mr. Tej Bahadur Roy, Advocates. For the Respondents : Mr. Harshwardhan Prasad, Sr. S.C. Mr. Rishi Raj Sinha, J. C. to Sr. S.C. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAHORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) Learned Senior Standing Counsel Mr. Harshwardhan 3 21-01-2013 Prasad appears for the respondent- Chief Commissioner of Income Tax. He states that he has received instructions to state that the amount of refund due to the petitioner and the statutory interest will be paid to the petitioner within one week from today. In view of the above statement, the petition is disposed of. In case, the respondent does not pay the amount of refund and the statutory interest within one week from today, the Sujit/- 2 / 2 petitioner will have liberty to revive this Petition. (R.M. Doshit, CJ) (Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan