Hawelia Builders Private Limited v. Assisstant Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle 10 (1) Delhi
High Court
17 Apr 2025 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Hawelia Builders Private Limited v. Assisstant Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle 10 (1) Delhi
Date of order
17 Apr 2025
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Hawelia Builders Private Limited v. Assisstant Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle 10 (1) Delhi, the High Court (2025) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: 7.The petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
$~105
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ W.P.(C) 15845/2024 & CM APPL. 66539/2024
HAWELIA BUILDERS PRIVATE LIMITED
.....Petitioner
Through: Ms. Ananya Kapoor, Mr. Sumit Lalchandani & Mr. Utkarsh Kumar Gupta, Advocates. Lalchandani & Mr. Utkarsh Kumar Gupta, Advocates.
versus
ASSISSTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 10 (1) DELHI .....Respondent
Through: Mr. Gaurav Gupta, Sr.SC, Mr. Shivendra Singh, Jr.SC & Mr. Yojit Pareek, Jr.SC for Revenue.
%
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRUHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TEJAS KARIA
O R D E R
17.04.2025
1.The Petitioner has filed the present petition, inter alia, impugning the notice dated 31.08.2024 issued under Section 148 [the impugned notice] of
the Income Tax Act, 1961 [the Act] seeking to reopen the assessment in respect of the Assessment Year 2015-16.
2.The Petitioner’s case is that the impugned notice has been issued beyond the period of the limitation.
3.Concededly, the issue involved in the present case is covered by the earlier decision of this court in Dinesh Jindal v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle 20, Delhi & Others: Neutral Citation: 2024:
DHC: 4554-DB, KAD Housing Private Limited v. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Central Circle-6, Delhi: Neutral Citation: 2024: DHC: 8214-DB and Pankaj Jain v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax,
Central Circle 3, Delhi & Anr. : Neutral Citation: 2025: DHC: 157-DB.
4. In terms of the aforesaid decisions, the period of ten years is required to be reckoned from the end of the assessment year, which is relevant to the previous year in which the notice under Section 148 of the Act has been issued.
5.The learned counsel appearing for the Revenue concurs with the aforesaid proposition.
6. In view of the above, the present petition is allowed. The impugned notice is set aside as being barred by limitation.
7.The petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms. The pending application also stands disposed of.
VIBHU BAKHRU, J
APRIL 17, 2025/ ‘A’
TEJAS KARIA, J
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.