Heard Shri v. Mca/10/2015

IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10 OF 2015INTAX APPEAL NO. 68 OF 2014 M/S. SAI PRASAD PROPERTIES LTD. THR. ITS DIRECTOR SHRI BALASAHEB KESHAV BHAPKAR. VersusTHE DEPARTMENT OF INCOME TAX, THR. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND 2 ORS. ... Applicant ... Respondent Shri Vilas P Thali, Advocate for the applicant. Ms. Asha Desai, Advocate for the respondents. -Coram:F. M. REIS &-Date: M. S. SANKLECHA, JJ. 27th March, 2015 P.C.: Heard Shri V. P. Thali, learned Counsel appearing for theapplicant and Ms. A. Desai, learned Counsel appearing for therespondents. 2. Upon hearing the learned Counsel, it is not in dispute that inthe meanwhile, the CIT(A) has disposed of the appeal by an orderdated 12.2.2015 preferred by the applicant. However, Shri Thali,learned Counsel appearing for the applicant states that the applicantwould prefer an appeal within the period of limitation along with anapplication for interim relief and that until the applicant obtains some relief from the CIT(A), the respondent should not take anycoercive action, based on the attachment carried out by therespondents. 3. In the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case and in the interest of justice, the respondents shall not take any furthercoercive action in connection with the assets attached of theapplicant for a period of two weeks from today, or until theapplication for interim relief that may be filed by the applicant, isdisposed of by the CIT(A), whichever is earlier. ssm. M. S. SANKLECHA, J. F. M. REIS, J.