Case LawHigh Court › Heard Sri v. Venugopal, The Learned Coun...

Heard Sri v. Venugopal, The Learned Counsel For The

High Court 02 Apr 2019 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Heard Sri v. Venugopal, The Learned Counsel For The
Date of order
02 Apr 2019
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Heard Sri v. Venugopal, The Learned Counsel For The, the High Court (2019) decided the matter.

Decision: Having regard to the circumstances of the case the writ petition is disposed of directing the second respondent to considerand dispose of Ext.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI TUESDAY ,THE 02ND DAY OF APRIL 2019 / 12TH CHAITHRA, 1941 WP(C).No. 10211 of 2019 PETITIONER: AVITTATHOOR SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.NO.706,P.O.AVITTATHOOR, MUKUNTHAPURAM, THRISSUR DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. BY ADVS.SRI.M.SASINDRANSRI.V.VENUGOPAL RESPONDENTS: 1THE INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 2(1),AYAKAR BHAVAN, INCOME TAX OFFICE, SHAKTHANTHAMPURAN NAGAR, THRISSUR-680001. 2THE COMMISSISONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS),3RD FLOOR, AAYAKAR BHAVAN, THRISSUR-680001. SC SRI.CHRISTOPHER ABRAHAM., SRI.O.P. JOS WINSON THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02.04.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT Heard Sri. V. Venugopal, the learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri. O.P. Jos Winson instructed by Sri. ChristopherAbraham, the learned Standing Counsel. 2. The petitioner prays for a direction to the second respondent to consider and dispose of Ext. P4 (a) stay petitionexpeditiously. 3. Having regard to the circumstances of the case the writ petition is disposed of directing the second respondent to considerand dispose of Ext. P4 (a)stay petition as expeditiously as possible,preferably within four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy ofthis judgment. Recovery proceedings pursuant to the orders under appeal before the second respondent are stayed for four weeks fromtoday. Sd/- S.V.BHATTI JUDGE SVP APPENDIX PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT P1 A TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE OF CLASSIFICATION ISSUED BY THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES (GENERAL), MUKUNDAPURAM. EXHIBIT P2 A TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 22.12.2018. EXHIBIT P3 A TRUE COPY OF THE DEMAND NOTICE DATED 22.12.2018 EXHIBIT P4 A TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL MEMORANDUM FILED BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT P4 A A TRUE COPY OF THE STAY PETITION FILED BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT P5 A TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE UNDER SECTION221(1) OF THE INCOME TAX ACT. EXHIBIT P6 A TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 21.12.2017 IN WPC.38566 OF 2017. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS : NIL //TRUE COPY// Sd/- PA TO JUDGE
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan