Case LawHigh Court › Heard v. B.sapna Reddy, Leamed Junior St...

Heard v. B.sapna Reddy, Leamed Junior Standing

High Court 18 Feb 2025 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Heard v. B.sapna Reddy, Leamed Junior Standing
Date of order
18 Feb 2025
Assessment year(s)
2005-2006, 2005-06
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Heard v. B.sapna Reddy, Leamed Junior Standing, the High Court (2025) dismissed the appeal.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY TWO THOUSAND AND PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE [P.SAM KOSHY]ANDTHE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE INCOME TAX TRIBUNA L APPEAL [NO: ][428 ] [2012] lncome Tax Tribunal Appeal Under [Section 260A ][of ][the ][lncome Tax ][Act,196'1]against the Order dated 26-06-2009 [passed ][in ] [No,961/Hyd/2008 ][for ][the]Assessment Year 2005-2006 on [the ][file ]of [the ][lncome ][Tax ][Appellate ][Tribunal,]Hyderabad Bench ['B', ]Hyderabad [preferred against ][the ][Order dated ]['1 ][4-03-2008]passed in ITA No.0566 to O571tCC'7, HYD/ClT(4)-1106-07 on [the ][file ][of ][the]commissioner of lncome Tax [(Appeals) ][- ] , [Hyderabad preferred against ][the ][order]dated 28-11-2006 [passed ]in GIR/PAN [No.AAIPY ][5604 ] [5-722 ][on the ftle of the]Assistant Commissioner of lncome Tax, [central Circle ]- [7, ][Hiderabad.] Between:Commissioner of lncome Tax [-lll, ]lT [Towers, ] [Guards, Masab ][Tank,]Hyderabad. ...Appella nt AND Y. Shivalinga Prasad, Plot No. 101, [Colony, Road ][No. ]['10C' ][Jubilee]Hills. Hyderabad. ... Respondent Counsel for the Appellant : Ms. Bokaro [Sapna Reddy representing] Sri J V Prasad, Sc for lncome Tax Counsel for the Respondent : Sri [Krishna ][Reddy] The Court delivered the following: [Judgment] \ .$ THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHYANI)THE HONOTIRABLE SRI JUSTICE NARSING RAONANDIKONDA ITTA No.428 OF 2012 JUDGMENT /per Hon'ble Sri.lustice P.Sam Koshy) Heard Vs. B.Sapna Reddy, leamed Junior Standing Counsel repre:;enting Mr. J.V.Prasad, learned Senkrr StandingCounsel for thc Income Tax Department for the appellant. Perusedthe lecord 2. This appeai under Section 260A of the Incc,me Tax Act,1961, has ber:n preferred by the Revenue as :he appellantagainst the orrler dated 26.06.2009 passed by the [ncome TaxAppellate l-ribunal, Hyderabad Bench 'B', H.rderabad,lnI.T.A.No.96 l/liYD/2008 for the Assessment Year 2005-06.3. Central floard of Direct Taxes (CBDT) has issued CircularNo.9 of 2024 dated 11 .09.2024, amending the previous CircularNo.5 of 2024 dated 15.03.2024, by further enhancing the monetarylimits for filing appeals by the Income Tax Department before theIncorne Tax Appellate Tribunals, High Courts and Strpreme Court as a measure [for ][reducing ][litigation' ][In ][paragraph ][2 of ][the ][said]Circular, [we ][find ][that ][the ][monetary ][limit ][fixed for frling ][an ][appeal]before the [High Court ][is ][Rs.2'00 ][crore'] 4In the instant [appeal, ][tax effect ][is ][well ][below ][the ][monetary]limit 5. Therefore, the [appeal ][filed by ][the Department is dismissed in]terms of [the ][aforesaid ][Circular ][No'9 ][of ][2024 ][dated ][17'09'2024']if [the ][appeal comes ][within ][the ][exception ][of ][Circular]However, No.5 of 2024, [\t ][would ][be ][open ][to ][the Income ][Tax ][Department ][to]seek revival [ofthe ][appeal. ][There ][shall ][be ][no order ][as ][to ][costs'] 6Consequently, [miscellaneous ][petitions pending, ][if ][any' ][shall]stand closed. sD,-M.vuAYAEs,t?ffifi /,TRUE ECTION To, 12.+[ 8:ffi:Jil:rui [i'f:: ][J: ][itr ][l^[ffi3f ]I ].f, l#;i'l * [*1",,.]iillX'Jr.il"ic?Tli"1","'{":Lrli""J;li:,::8[Ui'2.+[ 8:ffi:Jil:rui [i'f:: ][J: ][itr ][l^[ffi3f ]I ].f, l#;i'l * [*1",,.]iillX'Jr.il"ic?Tli"1","'{":Lrli""J;li:,::8[Ui'4One CC [to ][Sri ] [Prasad' ][t]Ad'o""te 6one CC [to ][Sri B ][Krishna ]""ddy' oTwo CD [CoPies]6one CC [to ][Sri B ][Krishna ]""ddy' oTwo CD [CoPies] ADt(PSLw HIGH COURT DATED:1810212025 JUDGMENTITTA.No.428 of 2012 DISMISSING THE ITTAWITHOUT COSTS Iag('Aktt e[lrr ] [s][ 14]46f'17 APt. M.Ctt-{rae rcHzo[+]
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan