Heard v. B.sapna Reddy, Leamed Junior Standing
High Court
18 Feb 2025 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Heard v. B.sapna Reddy, Leamed Junior Standing
Date of order
18 Feb 2025
Assessment year(s)
2005-2006, 2005-06
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Heard v. B.sapna Reddy, Leamed Junior Standing, the High Court (2025) dismissed the appeal.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR AT HYDERABAD
TUESDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY TWO THOUSAND AND
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE [P.SAM KOSHY]ANDTHE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE
INCOME TAX TRIBUNA L APPEAL [NO: ][428 ] [2012]
lncome Tax Tribunal Appeal Under [Section 260A ][of ][the ][lncome Tax ][Act,196'1]against the Order dated 26-06-2009 [passed ][in ] [No,961/Hyd/2008 ][for ][the]Assessment Year 2005-2006 on [the ][file ]of [the ][lncome ][Tax ][Appellate ][Tribunal,]Hyderabad Bench ['B', ]Hyderabad [preferred against ][the ][Order dated ]['1 ][4-03-2008]passed in ITA No.0566 to O571tCC'7, HYD/ClT(4)-1106-07 on [the ][file ][of ][the]commissioner of lncome Tax [(Appeals) ][- ] , [Hyderabad preferred against ][the ][order]dated 28-11-2006 [passed ]in GIR/PAN [No.AAIPY ][5604 ] [5-722 ][on the ftle of the]Assistant Commissioner of lncome Tax, [central Circle ]- [7, ][Hiderabad.]
Between:Commissioner of lncome Tax [-lll, ]lT [Towers, ] [Guards, Masab ][Tank,]Hyderabad.
...Appella nt
AND
Y. Shivalinga Prasad, Plot No. 101, [Colony, Road ][No. ]['10C' ][Jubilee]Hills. Hyderabad.
... Respondent
Counsel for the Appellant : Ms. Bokaro [Sapna Reddy representing]
Sri J V Prasad, Sc for lncome Tax
Counsel for the Respondent : Sri [Krishna ][Reddy]
The Court delivered the following: [Judgment]
\
.$
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHYANI)THE HONOTIRABLE SRI JUSTICE NARSING RAONANDIKONDA
ITTA No.428 OF 2012
JUDGMENT /per Hon'ble Sri.lustice P.Sam Koshy)
Heard Vs. B.Sapna Reddy, leamed Junior Standing
Counsel repre:;enting Mr. J.V.Prasad, learned Senkrr StandingCounsel for thc Income Tax Department for the appellant. Perusedthe lecord
2. This appeai under Section 260A of the Incc,me Tax Act,1961, has ber:n preferred by the Revenue as :he appellantagainst the orrler dated 26.06.2009 passed by the [ncome TaxAppellate l-ribunal, Hyderabad Bench 'B', H.rderabad,lnI.T.A.No.96 l/liYD/2008 for the Assessment Year 2005-06.3. Central floard of Direct Taxes (CBDT) has issued CircularNo.9 of 2024 dated 11 .09.2024, amending the previous CircularNo.5 of 2024 dated 15.03.2024, by further enhancing the monetarylimits for filing appeals by the Income Tax Department before theIncorne Tax Appellate Tribunals, High Courts and Strpreme Court
as a measure [for ][reducing ][litigation' ][In ][paragraph ][2 of ][the ][said]Circular, [we ][find ][that ][the ][monetary ][limit ][fixed for frling ][an ][appeal]before the [High Court ][is ][Rs.2'00 ][crore']
4In the instant [appeal, ][tax effect ][is ][well ][below ][the ][monetary]limit
5. Therefore, the [appeal ][filed by ][the Department is dismissed in]terms of [the ][aforesaid ][Circular ][No'9 ][of ][2024 ][dated ][17'09'2024']if [the ][appeal comes ][within ][the ][exception ][of ][Circular]However, No.5 of 2024, [\t ][would ][be ][open ][to ][the Income ][Tax ][Department ][to]seek revival [ofthe ][appeal. ][There ][shall ][be ][no order ][as ][to ][costs']
6Consequently, [miscellaneous ][petitions pending, ][if ][any' ][shall]stand closed.
sD,-M.vuAYAEs,t?ffifi
/,TRUE
ECTION
To,
12.+[ 8:ffi:Jil:rui [i'f:: ][J: ][itr ][l^[ffi3f ]I ].f, l#;i'l * [*1",,.]iillX'Jr.il"ic?Tli"1","'{":Lrli""J;li:,::8[Ui'2.+[ 8:ffi:Jil:rui [i'f:: ][J: ][itr ][l^[ffi3f ]I ].f, l#;i'l * [*1",,.]iillX'Jr.il"ic?Tli"1","'{":Lrli""J;li:,::8[Ui'4One CC [to ][Sri ] [Prasad' ][t]Ad'o""te 6one CC [to ][Sri B ][Krishna ]""ddy' oTwo CD [CoPies]6one CC [to ][Sri B ][Krishna ]""ddy' oTwo CD [CoPies]
ADt(PSLw
HIGH COURT
DATED:1810212025
JUDGMENTITTA.No.428 of 2012
DISMISSING THE ITTAWITHOUT COSTS
Iag('Aktt
e[lrr ] [s][ 14]46f'17 APt. M.Ctt-{rae rcHzo[+]
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.