Heard v. In View Of The Above, This Appeal Stands Dismissed
High Court
16 Sep 2016 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · mphc_db_jbp
Parties
Heard v. In View Of The Above, This Appeal Stands Dismissed
Date of order
16 Sep 2016
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Heard v. In View Of The Above, This Appeal Stands Dismissed, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal.
Decision: In view of the above, this appeal stands dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
ITA-28-2010
( COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-IIVs MADHYA PRADESH KSHETRA VITYUT VITRAN CO.LTD.)
16-09-2016
Shri Sanjay Lal for the appellant.
Shri Sapan Usrethe for the respondent.
Heard.
In view of the principle laid down by the Delhi HighCourt in the case of Commissioner of Income Tax (CIT)Vs. Delhi Transco Limited, (2016) 380 ITR 398; upheldby the Supreme Court in the SLP No.1387/2016 (CIT Vs.Delhi Transco Limited); and, further judgment of theKarnataka High Court in the case of CIT, Bangalore Vs.Hubli Electric Supply Company Limited, (2016) 237TAXMAN 7; and, the judgment of the Bombay High Court inthe case of CIT Vs. Maharashtra State ElectricityDistribution Company Limited (2015) 375 ITR 23, wesee no case for interference as the question of law raised inthis appeal by the revenue has already been decided againstthe revenue in the judgments referred to hereinabove andthe same has been upheld by the Supreme Court, whiledismissing the SLP filed by the revenue in the case of DelhiTransco Limited (supra).
In view of the above, this appeal stands dismissed.
(RAJENDRA MENON)ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
(SUBHASH KAKADE)JUDGE
aks
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue