Case Law › High Court › Hemendra Ranchhoddas Merchant v. Directo...

Hemendra Ranchhoddas Merchant v. Director Of Income Tax And Ors

High Court 02 Apr 2012 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

02 Apr 2012

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Hemendra Ranchhoddas Merchant v. Director Of Income Tax And Ors, the High Court (2012) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: For the reasons already indicated by the Court while dismissing Writ Petition 47 of 2011, the Petition stands disposed of.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

hvn IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (L) NO. 768 OF 2011 Hemendra Ranchhoddas Merchant ...Petitioner Versus Director of Income Tax and Ors. ...Respondents Mr. O.J. Menezes with Mr. P.P. Prabhu for the Petitioner. Mr. Suresh Kumar for Respondents. CORAM : DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD &M.S. SANKLECHA,JJ.DATED : APRIL 02, 2012 P.C. Counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner and the Revenue, state that the facts in the present case are similar to those in Writ Petition 47 of 2011, which is dismissed today. For the reasons already indicated by the Court while dismissing Writ Petition 47 of 2011, the Petition stands disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. (DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD,J.) (M.S. SANKLECHA,J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.