H.g.ramesh, J. (Oral)" v. Manjunatha Cotton Andginning Factory (2013) 359 Itr 565 (Karn)]. The Appeal Isaccordingly Dismissed

-1- - ITA No.651/2016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURUDATED THIS THE 1 DAY OF AUGUST 2Q1/ PRESENT| THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.G.RAMESH AND THE HON‘'BLE MRS, JUSTICE K.S.MUDAGAL INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.651/ 201 BETWEEN : 1.|PR.COMMISSIONER OF INCQME TAXK-MYSURU 2DTHE INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-1, MANDYA | .. APPELLANTS| (BY SRI E.I.SANMATHI, ADVOCATE) AND : SHRI. JAGANNATH S. SHETTY|M/S. SAGAR ENTERPRISES,V.V.ROAD, MANDYAP.A: ABNPS1LL5S4K . RESPONDENT| THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION260-A OF I.T.ACT, 1961 PRAYING TO FORMULATE SUBSTANTIAL|QUESTION OF LAW AND TO SET ASIDE THE APPELLATE ORDER|DATED: 30.06.2016 PASSED BY THE ITAT ‘A’ BENCH IN ITANO.725/BANG/2015, FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2005-06. THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL COMING ON FOR ADMISSION,|THIS DAY, H.G.RAMESH J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: - ITA No.651/2016 JUDGMENT H.G.RAMESH, J. (Oral)" Learned counsel for the appellants fairly submits that.the question raised in this appeal is answeredagainst theappellants by this Court in CIT v. Manjunatha Cotton And|Ginning Factory |(2013) 359 ITR 565 (Karn)]|. The appeal isaccordingly dismissed. 1)M Appeal dismissed, Sd/-|JUDGE JUDGE Sd/-|JUDGE JUDGE