H.g.ramesh, J. (Oral)! v. Manjunatha Cotton Andginning Factory [2013] 359 Itr 565 (Karn). Tne Appeal Is Accordingly Dismissed
High Court
26 Jul 2017 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
H.g.ramesh, J. (Oral)! v. Manjunatha Cotton Andginning Factory [2013] 359 Itr 565 (Karn). Tne Appeal Is Accordingly Dismissed
Date of order
26 Jul 2017
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In H.g.ramesh, J. (Oral)! v. Manjunatha Cotton Andginning Factory [2013] 359 Itr 565 (Karn). Tne Appeal Is Accordingly Dismissed, the High Court (2017) dismissed the appeal.
Decision: Tne appeal is accordingly dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
-1-
ITA No.127/2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURUDATED THIS THE 26 DAY QF JULY J2ZO1/
PRESENT|
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.G.RAMESH
AND
THE HON‘'BLE MRS, JUSTICE K.S.MUDAGAL
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.127/2016
BETWEEN :
1.THE PR,.COMMISSIONER OF INCOQME-TA
CIT (A), 5 FLOOR, BMTC BUILDING|
80 FEET ROAD, KORAMANGALA
BANGALORE-560 095|
2.THE INCOME-TAXK OFFICERWARD-1(1), 2 FLOORWARD-1(1), 2 FLOOR
BMIC BUILDING
80 FEET ROAD, KORAMANGALA
BANGALORE-560 OOS.
..APPELLANTS
(BY SRI E.I.SANMATHI FOR SRI K.V.ARAVIND, ADVOCATES) |
AND =
M/S.THE ESTATESHERIFF CENTER, 5 FLOOR
73/1, ST.MARKS ROADBANGALORE-560 OOQL
RESPONDENT
THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION260-A OF I.I.ACT 1961, PRAYING TO FORMULATE THE)SUBSTANTIAL QUESTION OF LAW AND 170 SET ASIDE THEORDER DATED 11.09.2015 PASSED IN ITA NO.578/BANG/2006,|FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2O0O0-2Z001
-2-
ITA No.127/2016
THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL COMING ON FOR ADMISSION,|THIS DAY, H.G.RAMESH J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
H.G.RAMESH, J. (Oral)!
Learned counsel for the appellants fairly submits that.the question raised in this appeal is answered against the|appellants by this Court in CIT v. Manjunatha Cotton And|Ginning Factory [2013] 359 ITR 565 (Karn). Tne appeal is accordingly dismissed.
HR|
Appeal dismissed,
Sd/-JUDGE|
Sd/-JUDGE|
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.