H.g.ramesh, J. (Oral v. Manjunatna Cottonand Ginning Factory [2013] 359 Itr 565 (Karn). The

-1- - ITA No.153/2016 C/w ITA No.152/2016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURUDATED THIS THE 26 DAY QF JULY J2ZO1/ PRESENT| THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.G.RAMESHAND THE HON‘'BLE MRS, JUSTICE K.S.MUDAGAL INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.153/2016C/WINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 152/2016 BETWEEN : 1.THE PR.COMMISSIONER OF| INCOME TAX, C.R.BUILDINGS QUEENS ROAD, BANGALORE-560 OO1.| 2.INCQME TAX OFFICER WARD 6(1), BANGALORE. | .. APPELLANTS(COMMON) (BY SRI E.I.SANMATHI, ADVOCATE) AND : SHRI E.KRISHNAPPA NO.1064, 8 CROSS * BLOCK, HMT LAYOUTBANGALORE-560 OQ9/ .. RESPONDENT(COMMON) ITA NO.153/2016 & ITA NO.152/2016 INCOME TAXAPPEALS ARE FILED UNDER SECTION 260-A OF I.T.ACT 1961,|PRAYING TO DECIDE THE FOREGOING QUESTION OF LAW AND|TO SET ASIDE THE APPELLATE ORDER DATED 14.08.2015|PASSED BY THE ITAT, B’ BENCH, BENGALURU, IN APPEAL|PROCEEDINGS|IN|TTANO, 314&315/BANG/2014FORASSESSMENT YEAR 2008-2009 AND 2009-2010 RESPECTIVELY. -2- - ITA No.153/2016 C/w ITA No.152/2016 THESE|INCOME|TAXAPPEALSCOMINGON|FORADMISSION, THIS DAY,H,.G.RAMESH J, DELIVERED THEFOLLOWING:JUDGMENT H.G.RAMESH, J. (Oral)# Learned counsel for the appellants fairly submits that.the question raised in these appeals is answeredagainstthe appellants by this Court in CIT v. Manjunatna Cotton|And Ginning Factory [2013] 359 ITR 565 (Karn). The) appeals are accordingly dismissed. Appeals dismissed. Sd/-|JUDGE| Sd/-|JUDGE|