H.g.ramesh, J. (Oral)! v. Tata Elxsi Ltd. (2012) 349 Itr 98 (Karn)]. Tne Appeal Is Accordinglygcismissecd

- ITA No.116/2017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURUDATED THIS THE 2 DAY QF AUGUST 2Q1/PRESENT| THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.G.RAMESH AND THE HON‘'BLE MRS, JUSTICE K.S.MUDAGAL INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.116/ 201 BETWEEN : 1.PR.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX-5 BMIC COMPLEX| KORAMANGALA. BENGALURU - 560 OO] 2.THE INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD(5)(1)(4) BENGALURU APPELLANTS (BY SRI E.I.L.SANMATHI, ADVOCATE AND : M/S RETAIL FULL SERVE LTD.(FORMERLY KNOWN AS SUPER|VALUE SERVICES INDIAPVT. LTD.)LEVEL-3, PINE VALLEYEMBASSY GOLD LINKBUSINESS PARK, KORAMANGALA|INTERMEDIATE RING ROAD|BENGALURU - 560 0/1~, RESPONDENT THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL [IS FILED UNDER SECTION260-A OF I.T.ACT 1961, PRAYING TO FORMULATE SUBSTANTIAL|QUESTIONS OF LAW AND TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED.26.10.2016 PASSED BY THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL,| -2- - ITA No.116/2017 ‘CBENCH,BANGALORE,IN|APPEALPROCEEDINGSTTA]NO.57/BANG/2016 FOR ASSESSMENT YEAR 2009-2010 THIS ITA COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS” DAY,H.G.,.RAMESH , DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT H.G.RAMESH, J. (Oral)! Learned counsel for the appellants fairly submits that.the question raised in this appeal is answered against the|appellants by this Court in CIT v. Tata Elxsi Ltd. |(2012) 349 ITR 98 (Karn)|]. Tne appeal is accordinglyGcismissecd Appeal dismissed, Sd/-|JUDGE| Sd/-JUDGE|