H.g.ramesh, J. (Oral)$ v. Tata Elxsi Ltd. 2012] 349Itr 98 (Karn). Tne Appeal Is Accordingly Dismissed
High Court
31 Jul 2017 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
H.g.ramesh, J. (Oral)$ v. Tata Elxsi Ltd. 2012] 349Itr 98 (Karn). Tne Appeal Is Accordingly Dismissed
Date of order
31 Jul 2017
Assessment year(s)
2008-2009
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In H.g.ramesh, J. (Oral)$ v. Tata Elxsi Ltd. 2012] 349Itr 98 (Karn). Tne Appeal Is Accordingly Dismissed, the High Court (2017) dismissed the appeal.
Decision: Tne appeal is accordingly dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
-
ITA No.418/2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURUDATED THIS THE 31 DAY QF JULY JZO1/7PRESENT|
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.G.RAMESH
AND
THE HON‘'BLE MRS, JUSTICE K.S.MUDAGAL
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.418/ 201
BETWEEN :
1.|THE PR.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
CIT (A), 5 FLOOR, BMTC BUILDING|
80 FEET ROAD, KORAMANGALA
BENGALURU-560 095|
2.THE INCOME-TAXK OFFICER
WARD-1(1)(2), PRESENT ADDRESS
& FLOOR, BMTC BUILDING.
80 FEET ROAD, KORAMANGALA
BENGALURU-560 O95|
.. APPELLANTS
(BY SRI ARAVIND K.V. ADVOCATE) |
AND :
M/S. AT & T GLOBAL BUSINESSSERVICES INDIA PVT. LTD.BLOCK A, GROUND FLOORSALARPURIA, SOFT ZONEBELLANDUR POST|BENGALURU _RESPONDENTTHIS INCOME TAX APPEAL [IS FILED UNDER SECTION |260-A OF I.T.ACT, 1961 PRAYING TO FORMULATE- THESUBSTANTIAL QUESTION OF LAW AND TO SET ASIDE THE.APPELLATE.ORDERDATED:O08.01.7201PASSEDIN|ITANO.1604/BANG/2012, FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2008-2009.
-
ITA No.418/2016
THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL COMING ON FOR ADMISSION,|THIS DAY,H,G,. RAMESH , DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
H.G.RAMESH, J. (Oral)$
Learned counsel for the appellants fairly submits that.the question raised in this appeal is answered against the|appellants by this Court in CIT v. Tata Elxsi Ltd. |2012]| 349ITR 98 (Karn). Tne appeal is accordingly dismissed.
Appeal dismissed.
HR|
Sd/-|JUDGE
Sd/-
JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.