H.g.ramesh, J. (Oral v. Tata Elxsi Ltd. 2012] 349Itr 98 (Karn). Tne Appeal Is Accordingly Dismissed

- ITA No.467/2016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURUDATED THIS THE 31 DAY QF JULY JZO1/7 PRESENT| THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.G.RAMESH AND THE HON‘'BLE MRS, JUSTICE K.S.MUDAGAL INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.467/2016 BETWEEN : 1.|THE PR.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIT (A), 5 FLOOR, BMIC BUILDING 80 FEET ROAD, KORAMANGALA BENGALURU-560 095| 2DTHE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAXCIRCLE-2(1) (1)5 FLOOR, BMTC BUILDING|80 FEET ROAD, KORAMANGALABENGALURU-560 O95|.. APPELLANTSCIRCLE-2(1) (1)5 FLOOR, BMTC BUILDING|80 FEET ROAD, KORAMANGALABENGALURU-560 O95|.. APPELLANTS (BY SRI ARAVIND K.V. ADVOCATE) | AND : M/S.CENTURY LINK TECHNOLOGY INDIA PVT. LTD.,.SALARPURIA HALLMARK, BLOCK II I&II FLOORS, 002 B-WING, SURVEY NO.15/3& 16, KADUBEESANAHALLI, VARTHUR ROAD.BENGALURU-560 O96| RESPONDENT THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION260-A OF I.T.ACT, 1961 PRAYING TO FORMULATE SUBSTANTIAL|QUESTION OF LAW AND TO SET ASIDE THE APPELLATE ORDER|DATED:27.04.2016 PASSED IN ITA NO.1391/BANG/2015, FORTHE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2010-11. - ITA No.467/2016 THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL COMING ON FOR ADMISSION,|THIS DAY,H,G,. RAMESH , DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT H.G.RAMESH, J. (Oral)# Learned counsel for the appellants fairly submits that.the question raised in this appeal is answered against the|appellants by this Court in CIT v. Tata Elxsi Ltd. |2012]| 349ITR 98 (Karn). Tne appeal is accordingly dismissed. Appeal dismissed. HR| Sd/-'|JUDGE Sd/-'| JUDGE