H.g.ramesh, J. (Oral)" v. Tata Elxsi Ltd
High Court
03 Aug 2017 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
H.g.ramesh, J. (Oral)" v. Tata Elxsi Ltd
Date of order
03 Aug 2017
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In H.g.ramesh, J. (Oral)" v. Tata Elxsi Ltd, the High Court (2017) dismissed the appeal.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
-
ITA No.376/2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURUDATED THIS THE 3 DAY QF AUGUST 2Q1/PRESENT|
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.G.RAMESH
AND
THE HON‘'BLE MRS, JUSTICE K.S.MUDAGAL
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.376/ 201
BETWEEN :
1.|THE PR.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
CIT (A), 5 FLOOR, BMTC BUILDING|
80 FEET ROAD, KORAMANGALA
BENGALURU-560 095|
2.THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
RANGE-11(3), PRESENT ADDRESS
CIRCLE-3(1)(2), 7 FLOOR, BMTC BUILDING.
80 FEET ROAD, KORAMANGALA
BENGALURU-560 O95|.. APPELLANTS
(BY SRI ARAVIND K.V. ADVOCATE) |
AND :
M/S. GE BE PVT.LTD.|NO.60,EXPORT PROMOTION INDUSTRIAL PARKWHITEFIELDBENGALURU-560 Q66|RESPONDENT
THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL [S FILED UNDER SECTION |260-A OF I.I.ACT, 1961 PRAYING TO FORMULATE- THESUBSTANTIAL QUESTION OF LAW AND TO SET ASIDE THE.APPELLATE ORDER DATED: 04.11.2016 PASSED BY ITAT ‘B’]BENCH IN ITA NO.1222/BANG/2010, FOR THE ASSESSMENT|YEAR 2006-200 /.
-
ITA No.376/2017
THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL COMING ON FOR ADMISSION,|THIS DAY,H,G,. RAMESH , DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
H.G.RAMESH, J. (Oral)"
Learned counsel for the appellants fairly submits that.the question raised in this appeal is answered against the|appellants by this Court in CIT v. Tata Elxsi Ltd.
(2012) 349 ITR 98 (Karn)|]. Tne appeal is accordinglyaismissecd.
Appeal dismissed,
HR|
Sd/-JUDGE|
Sd/-
JUDGE|
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.