H.g.ramesh, J. (Oral)" v. Tata Elxsi Ltd

- ITA No.87/2016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURUDATED THIS THE 12 DAY QF SEPTEMBER JZQO1/PRESENT| THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.G.RAMESH AND THE HON‘'BLE MRS, JUSTICE K.S.MUDAGAL INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.87/2016 BETWEEN : 1.|THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX CIT(A), 5 FLOOR, BMTC BUILDING 80 FEET ROAD, KORAMANGALA BANGALORE - 560 095 2.THE ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX|CIRCLE-11(4), 2 FLOOR, BMTC BUILDING.CIRCLE-11(4), 2 FLOOR, BMTC BUILDING. 80 FEET ROAD, KORAMANGALA BANGALORE —- 560 O95.. APPELLANTS (BY SRI K.V.ARVIND, ADVOCATE) AND = M/S IGATE GLOBAL SOLUTIONS LTD.NO.158-192 (P) & 165(P)-170(P)EPIP PHASE-II, WHITEFIELDBANGALORE - 560 066~.. RESPONDENT (BY SRI T.SURYANARAYANA, ADVOCATE) THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL [IS FILED UNDER SECTION260-A OF I.T.ACT, 1961 PRAYING TO FORMULATE THE)SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW AND TO SET ASIDE THE.ORDER DATED 30.07.2015 PASSED IN ITA NO.1239/BANG/2010,|FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2006-2007 PASSED BY THE ITAT,|BENGALURU AND CONFIRM THE ORDER PASSED BY THE DEPUTY|COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-11(4), BENGALURU. - ITA No.87/2016 THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL COMING ON FOR ADMISSION,|THIS DAY,H,G,. RAMESH , DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT H.G.RAMESH, J. (Oral)" Learned Counsel appearing for the appellants fairly|submits that the question raised in this appeal is answeredagainst tne appellants by this Court in CIT v. Tata Elxsi Ltd. 1(2012) 349 ITR 98 (Karn)|]. Tne appeal is accordingly Gcismissecd Appeal dismissed. KSR Sd/-. JUDGE| Sd/-— JUDGE|