H.g.ramesh, J. (Oral v. Yokogawa India Ltd.12012) 341 Itr 385 (Karn). The Appeal Is Accordinglyaismissecd
High Court
31 Jul 2017 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
H.g.ramesh, J. (Oral v. Yokogawa India Ltd.12012) 341 Itr 385 (Karn). The Appeal Is Accordinglyaismissecd
Date of order
31 Jul 2017
Assessment year(s)
2008-2009
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In H.g.ramesh, J. (Oral v. Yokogawa India Ltd.12012) 341 Itr 385 (Karn). The Appeal Is Accordinglyaismissecd, the High Court (2017) dismissed the appeal.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
-
ITA No.416/2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURUDATED THIS THE 31 DAY QF JULY JZO1/7PRESENT|
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.G.RAMESH
AND
THE HON‘'BLE MRS, JUSTICE K.S.MUDAGAL
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.416/ 201
BETWEEN :
1.|THE PR.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
CIT (A), 5 FLOOR, BMTC BUILDING|
80 FEET ROAD, KORAMANGALA
BENGALURU-560 095|
2.THE INCOME-TAXK OFFICER
WARD-1(1)(4), PRESENT ADDRESS
& FLOOR, BMTC BUILDING.
80 FEET ROAD, KORAMANGALA
BENGALURU-560 O95|.. APPELLANTS
(BY SRI ARAVIND K.V. ADVOCATE) |
AND :
M/S.BRITISH ENGINES (INDIA) PVT.LTD.,NO.6A, ATTIBELE INDUSTRIAL AREABENGALURU-567 107|
~.. RESPONDENT
THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL [S FILED UNDER SECTION |260-A OF I.T.ACT, 1961 PRAYING [TQ FORMULATE THE|SUBSTANTIAL QUESTION OF LAW AND TO SET ASIDE THE.TRIBUNAL.ORDERDATED:227.01.2016PASSED|IN|TTANO.1277/BANG/2014, FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2008-2009.
THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL COMING ON FOR ADMISSION,|THIS DAY, H.G.RAMESH J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
-
ITA No.416/2016
JUDGMENT
H.G.RAMESH, J. (Oral)#
Learned counsel for the appellants fairly submits that.the question raised in this appeal is answered against the|appellants by this Court in CIT v. Yokogawa India Ltd.|12012) 341 ITR 385 (Karn). The appeal is accordinglyaismissecd.
Appeal dismissed,
HR|
Sd/-|
JUDGE
Sd/-
JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.