Hindalco Industries Ltd. ...Review v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
21 Nov 2009 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Hindalco Industries Ltd. ...Review v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
21 Nov 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Hindalco Industries Ltd. ...Review v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Issue: Once the Review Petition is not maintainable, there is no question of considering whether cause is sufficient.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONNOTICE OF MOTION NO. 4348 OF 2009IN REVIEW PETITON (L) NO. 62 OF 2009ININCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 3775 OF 2008
Hindalco Industries Ltd. ...Review Petitioner
Versus
The Commissioner of Income Tax
...Respondent
Mr. P.C. Tripathi i/by Mr. Pankaj Toprani for Petitioner.
Mr. J.S. Saluja, A.G.P. For Respondent.
CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & R.S. MOHITE, JJ. DATED : NOVEMBER 21, 2009
P.C.
This court has today dismissed Review Petition (L) No. 36 of 2009 in Income Tax Appeal No. 750 of 2008 in the case of Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. West Coast Paper Mills Limited. For the same reasons as set out therein, this Review Petition as filed is not maintainable. Once the Review Petition is not maintainable, there is no question of considering whether cause is sufficient. In the light of that, Notice of Motion along with Review Petition dismissed.
(R.S. MOHITE, J.)
(F.I. REBELLO,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue