Case LawHigh Court › Hindustan Unilever Ltd v. Deputy Commiss...

Hindustan Unilever Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Sp. Range 2 & Ors

High Court 12 Mar 2021 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Hindustan Unilever Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Sp. Range 2 & Ors
Date of order
12 Mar 2021
Assessment year(s)
1990-91
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Hindustan Unilever Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Sp. Range 2 & Ors, the High Court (2021) decided the matter.

Decision: Appeal is accordingly disposed of as withdrawn.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

(8)-ITXA-366-13.doc. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.366 OF 2013 Hindustan Unilever Ltd. ..Appellant Versus Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax, Sp. Range 2 & Ors. ..Respondents Mr. Rajesh Poojari i/by Mulla & Mulla Craigie Blunt & Caroe, for theAppellant. Mr. Sham Walve h/f Mr. P. C. Chhotaray, for the Respondents. CORAM : UJJAL BHUYAN & MILIND N. JADHAV, JJ. DATE : 12[th] MARCH, 2021 P.C. Heard Mr. Rajesh Poojari, learned counsel for the appellantand Mr. Sham Walve holding for Mr. P. C. Chhotaray, learned counsel forthe respondents. 2. This appeal has been preferred by the assessee as the appellantunder section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order dated31.08.2012 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “J” Bench,Mumbai in ITA No.9317/Mum/1992 and ITA No.9577/Mum/1992 forthe assessment year 1990-91. 3. The appeal was admitted by this Court by order dated17.02.2015 on the substantial questions of law framed in the said order. 1 of 2 Digitallysigned byBalajiG.PanchalBalaji G.PanchalDate:2021.03.1511:01:54+0530 (8)-ITXA-366-13.doc. 4. Today the appeal is before us on a praecipe filed by learnedcounsel for the appellant. 5. It is stated that Parliament has enacted the Direct Tax Vivad seVishwas Act, 2020 providing for a scheme for resolution of tax disputes. Interms thereof, appellant has filed declaration under section 3 before thedesignated authority. Designated authority has issued certificate undersection 5(1) on 23.02.2021 determining the amount payable. For passingof the final order under section 5(2), appellant is required to withdraw theappeal under section 4(3) and to furnish proof of withdrawal along withintimation of payment, if any, to the designated authority. Hence, prayerfor withdrawal of the appeal. 6. Learned counsel for the respondents has no objection to theprayer made. 7. Having regard to the above, we allow withdrawal of the appeal. 8. Appeal is accordingly disposed of as withdrawn. 9. Refund as per rules. MILIND N. JADHAV, J UJJAL BHUYAN, J BGP. 2 of 2
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan