Case LawHigh Court › Hindustan Unilever Ltd v. Deputy Commiss...

Hindustan Unilever Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Special Range-2

High Court 03 Feb 2021 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Hindustan Unilever Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Special Range-2
Date of order
03 Feb 2021
Assessment year(s)
1985-86
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Hindustan Unilever Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Special Range-2, the High Court (2021) decided the matter.

Decision: Accordingly, the appeal is disposed of as withdrawn.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 344 OF 2007 Hindustan Unilever Ltd...Appellant Versus Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax, Special Range-2 ..Respondent ................... Mr. Rajesh Poojary i/by Mulla & Mulla Craigie Blunt and Caroe for theAppellant.Appellant. Mr. Sham Walve for the Respondent. ................... CORAM : UJJAL BHUYAN & MILIND N. JADHAV, JJ. DATE : FEBRUARY 03, 2021. P.C.: Heard Mr. Rajesh Poojary, learned counsel for the appellant andMr. Sham Walve, learned standing counsel, revenue for therespondent. 2. This appeal under section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 hasbeen preferred by the assessee as the appellant against the order dated 12.09.2006 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, MumbaiBench, "E" Bench, in ITA No. 4997/Bom/1990 for the assessment year1985-86. 3.The appeal was admitted by this Court on 03.03.2009 on thesubstantial questions of law framed in the said order. 4.Today the appeal is before us on a praecipe filed by learnedcounsel for the appellant. 5. It is submitted that Parliament has enacted the Direct Tax Vivadse Vishwas Act, 2020 (briefly 'the Act' hereinafter) providing for ascheme for resolution of tax disputes. Appellant has filed a declarationunder section 3 of the said Act before the Designated Authority whichhad thereafter issued a certificate under section 5(1) of the said Actdetermining the amount payable by the appellant at Nil. However, forpassing of the final order under section 5(2) of the said Act, appellantis required to withdraw the appeal in terms of section 4(3) thereof.Hence, the prayer for withdrawal of the appeal. 6. Learned counsel for the respondent has no objection to theprayer made for withdrawal of the appeal. 7. Considering the above, we allow the appellant to withdraw theappeal. Accordingly, the appeal is disposed of as withdrawn.appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is disposed of as withdrawn. 8. Refund as per Rules. [ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ] [ UJJAL BHUYAN, J. ] Digitallysigned byRavindraRavindra M.M.AmberkarDate:Amberkar2021.02.0514:43:15+0530
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan