Case LawHigh Court › Hitech Agency18/417, Near Sree Durga Bha...

Hitech Agency18/417, Near Sree Durga Bhagavathi Temple, Kariakalkannara, Thrissur v. Menonmeera V.menon

High Court 15 Jun 2022 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Hitech Agency18/417, Near Sree Durga Bhagavathi Temple, Kariakalkannara, Thrissur v. Menonmeera V.menon
Date of order
15 Jun 2022
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Hitech Agency18/417, Near Sree Durga Bhagavathi Temple, Kariakalkannara, Thrissur v. Menonmeera V.menon, the High Court (2022) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPINATH P. WEDNESDAY, THE 15 DAY OF JUNE 2022 / 25TH JYAISHTA, 1944WP(C) NO. 19319 OF 2022 PETITIONER: HITECH AGENCY18/417, NEAR SREE DURGA BHAGAVATHI TEMPLE, KARIAKALKANNARA, THRISSUR - 680652, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER, SASI V.B. BY ADVS.HARISANKAR V. MENONMEERA V.MENON RESPONDENTS: 1INCOME TAX OFFICERINCOME TAX DEPARTMENT, WARD - 2(2), SAKTHANTHAMPURAN NAGAR, THRISSUR - 680001. 2THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX APPEAL, INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT, SAKTHANTHAMPURAN NAGAR, THRISSUR- 680001. OTHER PRESENT: SRI. JOSE JOSEPH (SC) THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON15.06.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: J U D G M E N T Challenging Ext.P1 order the petitioner has filed Ext.P2 appeal before 2[nd]respondent along with Ext.P3 application for stay. The only relief is sought for adirection to the 2[nd] respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P2 and to stayany proceedings for recovery of any amount determined under Ext.P1 till such timeas orders are passed on the stay application. 2.Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, this writpetition will stand disposed of directing the competent among the respondentsbefore whom Ext.P3 application for stay is pending, to consider and pass orders onExt.P3 within 2 months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment.Till such time as orders are passed on Ext.P3, any demand pursuant to Ext.P1 shallbe kept in abeyance. AMG Sd/-GOPINATH P. JUDGE APPENDIX OF WP(C) 19319/2022 PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit P1COPY OF ASSESSMENT ORDER FOR THE YEAR 2017-18 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 09.12.2019. BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 09.12.2019. Exhibit P2COPY OF APPEAL FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2NDRESPONDENT DATED 09.01.2019.RESPONDENT DATED 09.01.2019. Exhibit P3COPY OF STAY PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 09.01.2019.THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 09.01.2019.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan