H.l. Gokhale, J v. R. Kingaonkar,J
High Court
07 Aug 2006 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
H.l. Gokhale, J v. R. Kingaonkar,J
Date of order
07 Aug 2006
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In H.l. Gokhale, J v. R. Kingaonkar,J, the High Court (2006) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2159 OF 2006IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (LODGING) NO.999 OF 2006
M/s.J. Pitamberdas
vs.Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax,Central Circle-17, Mumbai.
Mr.Jitendra Jain with Mr.A.K.Jasani for the applicant.
Mr.P.P. Kakade for the respondent.
CORAM: H.L.GOKHALE &V.R.KINGAONKAR,JJ.
DATED: 7th August, 2006
P.C.
Applicant
Respondent
Heard Mr.Jain in support of this motion. Mr.Kakade
appears for the respondent.
2. The notice of motion seeks condonation of delay of
61 days in filing the appeal.
3. The explanation is given in paragraph 3 of thesupporting affidavit. We accept the explanation. Delayis condoned. The notice of motion is granted in termsof prayer (a). Appeal be numbered and listed foradmission on 14th August, 2006.4. Mr.Jain states that he will replace the copies of
of prayer (a). Appeal be numbered and listed foradmission on 14th August, 2006.
the impugned order with neatly typed copies in double
space.
( H.L. GOKHALE, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue