H.l. Gokhale, J v. R. Kingaonkar,J
High Court
02 Aug 2006 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
H.l. Gokhale, J v. R. Kingaonkar,J
Date of order
02 Aug 2006
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In H.l. Gokhale, J v. R. Kingaonkar,J, the High Court (2006) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1592 OF 2006
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (LODGING) NO.1104 OF 2005
The Commissioner of Income-taxMumbai City-9, Mumbai.vs.M/s.Pelican Investment Pvt.Ltd.
AppellantRespondent
Mr.S.M.Shah for the appellant.
CORAM: H.L.GOKHALE &V.R.KINGAONKAR,JJ.
DATED: 2nd August, 2006
P.C.
Heard Mr.Shah, the counsel in support of the noticeof motion. The respondent is not present though served.2. The motion seeks condonation of delay of 102 days infiling the appeal. An explanation is given in thesupporting affidavit and chronological information isgiven with respect to the steps taken and as to how thedelay occurred. We accept the explanation and allowthis notice of motion in terms of prayer (a). The delayis condoned. The appeal be numbered and listed for
admission on 16th August, 2006 before which theappellant will serve the respondent.
3. The notice of motion stands disposed of accordingly.
( H.L. GOKHALE, J.)
( V. R. KINGAONKAR,J. )
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue