H.l. Gokhale, J v. R. Kingaonkar,J
High Court
31 Jul 2006 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
H.l. Gokhale, J v. R. Kingaonkar,J
Date of order
31 Jul 2006
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In H.l. Gokhale, J v. R. Kingaonkar,J, the High Court (2006) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPLICATION NO.215 OF 2000
ALONG WITHWITH
INCOME TAX APPLICATION NO.216 OF 2000
INCOME TAX APPLICATION NO.217 OF 2000
AND WITH
INCOME TAX APPLICATION NO.218 OF 2000
The Commissioner of Income Tax,Mumbai City I,Mumbai.vs.
M/s.Tata Housing Development Co.Ltd.Mumbai.
ApplicantsRespondents
Mr.A.G.Kotangale for the applicants in theseapplications.
Mr.P.C.Tripathi with Mr.Dinesh Vyas for therespondents in all these applications.
CORAM: H.L.GOKHALE &V.R.KINGAONKAR,JJ.
DATED: 31st July, 2006
P.C.
Heard Mr.Kotangale in support of all these
applications.
therefore, to be gone into in these Applications.
3. All these Applications stand disposed ofaccordingly.
( H.L. GOKHALE, J.)
( V. R. KINGAONKAR,J. )
( V. R. KINGAONKAR,J. )
( V. R. KINGAONKAR,J. )
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue