H.l. Gokhale, J v. R. Kingaonkar,J
High Court
07 Aug 2006 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
H.l. Gokhale, J v. R. Kingaonkar,J
Date of order
07 Aug 2006
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In H.l. Gokhale, J v. R. Kingaonkar,J, the High Court (2006) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1330 OF 2006IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (LODGING) NO.510 OF 2006
Smt.Beneben Naranbhai Tandel, Nani Daman Applicant
vs.Income-tax Officer, Vapi-Ward-4,Nani Daman
Mr.A.K.Jasani for the applicant.
Mr.A.N.Kotangale for the respondent no.1.
CORAM: H.L.GOKHALE &V.R.KINGAONKAR,JJ.
DATED: 7th August, 2006
P.C.
Respondent
Heard Mr.Jasani in support of this motion.
Mr.Kotangale appears for the respondent no.1.
2. The notice of motion seeks condonation of delay of
two days in filing the appeal.
3. The affidavit in support gives an explanation as towhy the delay was caused. That was because theappellant could not come down to Mumbai to file theappeal and the affidavit in time from Daman. We acceptthe explanation. The notice of motion is granted in
terms of prayer (a). Delay is condoned. The appeal be
listed for admission on 14th August, 2006.
( H.L. GOKHALE, J.)
( V. R. KINGAONKAR,J. )
( V. R. KINGAONKAR,J. )
( V. R. KINGAONKAR,J. )
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue