Case Law › High Court › Hon’ble v. K. Bist, J. Hon’ble U. C. Dhy...

Hon’ble v. K. Bist, J. Hon’ble U. C. Dhyani, J

High Court 15 Jan 2015 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · ukhcucis_pg

Parties

Date of order

15 Jan 2015

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Hon’ble v. K. Bist, J. Hon’ble U. C. Dhyani, J, the High Court (2015) decided the matter.

Decision: In view of above, the present appeal is disposed of in terms of aforesaid Income Tax Appeal no.7 of 2003 and the question of law raised in the present appeal is decided accordingly against the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

ITA NO.2 OF 2015 Hon’ble V. K. Bist, J. Hon’ble U. C. Dhyani, J. Mr. S. K. Posti, Advocate present for the appellant. Mr. H. M. Bhatia, Advocate present for the Income Tax Department. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the question of law involved in the present appeal is squarely covered by the judgment and order dated 23.02.2006 by this Court in Income Tax Appeal no.7 of 2003, titled as“Commissioner of Income Tax & another vs. Sedco Forex International, Inc.”, reported in 299 ITR 238.Learned counsel for the respondent/department fairly conceded the aforesaid fact. In view of above, the present appeal is disposed of in terms of aforesaid Income Tax Appeal no.7 of 2003 and the question of law raised in the present appeal is decided accordingly against the assessee. (U. C. Dhyani, J.) (V. K. Bist, J.) Dated 15.01.2015 Rawat

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.