Honda Trading Corporation India Private Limited v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income-Tax & Ors
High Court
04 Apr 2024 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Honda Trading Corporation India Private Limited v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income-Tax & Ors
Date of order
04 Apr 2024
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Honda Trading Corporation India Private Limited v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income-Tax & Ors, the High Court (2024) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: The writ petition fails and shall stand dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
$~84
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 4778/2024
HONDA TRADING CORPORATION INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Nageswar Rao, Mr. Aman Rewaria, Mr. Parth and Ms. Viyushti Rawat, Advs.
versus
ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX & ORS.
..... Respondents
Through: Mr. Abhishek Maratha, SSC along with Mr. Parth Semwal, JSC and Ms. Nupur Sharma, Adv.
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YASHWANT VARMAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV
O R D E R
%
04.04.2024
1.This writ petition has been preferred impugning the order dated 31 August 2023 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal [‘ITAT’] on a miscellaneous application which had been made.
2.We note that the miscellaneous application emanated from a perceived incorrect appreciation by the lower authorities of an order passed by the ITAT and it was in the aforesaid context that the ITAT was moved with the following prayer: -
“[Our Submission]
As can be noticed from the above, authorities misinterpreted/sat in judgement over the directions issued by this Hon’ble Tribunal vide order dated 8.03.2013 and unjustly denied the fruits of litigation.
By present application we respectfully request for appropriate clarification/directions to give effect to Hon’ble Tribunal’s order, after giving suitable opportunity of being heard. The Applicant also states and confirms that it has not filed any Miscellaneous Application under section 254(2) earlier before the Hon’ble Tribunal against the subject order.
Prayed accordingly.”
3.It is this application which has come to be rejected in terms of the order impugned. As is manifest from the prayers as carried in that application, the ITAT was essentially called upon to render appropriate clarification and directions. That cannot possibly be construed to be the remit of Section 254(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [‘Act’].
4.On an overall conspectus of the aforesaid, we find no ground to interfere with the dismissal of the miscellaneous application. The writ petition fails and shall stand dismissed.
YASHWANT VARMA, J.
APRIL 04, 2024 RW
PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.