Case Law › High Court › Hoshiarpur Improvement Trust v. Commissi...

Hoshiarpur Improvement Trust v. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), Jalandhar And Others

High Court 01 Apr 2014 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · phhc

Parties

Date of order

01 Apr 2014

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

Case summary

In Hoshiarpur Improvement Trust v. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), Jalandhar And Others, the High Court (2014) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANAAT CHANDIGARH CWP No. 22948 of 2013 Decided on : 01.04.2014 Hoshiarpur Improvement Trust . . . Petitioner Versus Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Jalandhar and others . . . Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTALHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASPAL SINGH PRESENT: Mr. Rohit Sud, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Vivek Sethi, Advocate for the respondents. **** AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the present writ petition has become infructuous and may be disposed of as such. Learned counsel for the respondents does not dispute the same. 2.Ordered accordingly. (AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) JUDGE April 01, 2014 J.Ram (JASPAL SINGH) JUDGE

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.