Case LawHigh Court › Hotel Krishna Prasad, Chennai-6 v. The I...

Hotel Krishna Prasad, Chennai-6 v. The Income Tax Officer, Business

High Court 16 Sep 2015 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Hotel Krishna Prasad, Chennai-6 v. The Income Tax Officer, Business
Date of order
16 Sep 2015
Assessment year(s)
2002-03
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Hotel Krishna Prasad, Chennai-6 v. The Income Tax Officer, Business, the High Court (2015) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: Therefore, the above tax case appeal is dismissed for non prosecution.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

In the High Court of Judicature at Madras Dated : 16.9.2015 Coram : The Honourable Mr.Justice V.RAMASUBRAMANIAN and The Honourable Mr.Justice T.MATHIVANAN T.C.A.No.2682 of 2006 Hotel Krishna Prasad, Chennai-6. ...Appellant Vs The Income Tax Officer, Business Ward XV(4), Chennai. ...Respondent TAX CASE APPEAL under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order dated 13.10.2006 made in I.T.A.No.1167/(Mds)/2005 on the file of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal 'A' Bench, Chennai for the assessment year 2002-03. Appellant : No appearanceFor Respondent : Mr.T.Ravikumar Judgment was delivered by V.RAMASUBRAMANIAN,J The learned counsel, who appeared for the appellant passed away. His junior reported that the client could not be traced. Notice sent to the appellant returned with the endorsement 'vacated'. 2. Therefore, the above tax case appeal is dismissed for non prosecution. (V.R.S.J.) (T.M.J.) V.RAMASUBRAMANIAN,JAND T.MATHIVANAN,JRS ToThe Income Tax Appellate Tribunal 'A' Bench, Chennai. T.C.A.No.2682 of 2006
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan