Case LawHigh Court › Howden Solyvent India Private Limited v....

Howden Solyvent India Private Limited v. The Income Tax Officer, Corp Ward 2(3),Income Tax Department,Chennai-Wanaparthy Block

High Court 19 Sep 2024 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Howden Solyvent India Private Limited v. The Income Tax Officer, Corp Ward 2(3),Income Tax Department,Chennai-Wanaparthy Block
Date of order
19 Sep 2024
Assessment year(s)
2018-2019
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Howden Solyvent India Private Limited v. The Income Tax Officer, Corp Ward 2(3),Income Tax Department,Chennai-Wanaparthy Block, the High Court (2024) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

W.P.Nos.5548 and 5554 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 19.09.2024 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN W.P.Nos.5548 and 5554 of 2022 and W.M.P.Nos.5653, 5654, 5656 and 5659 of 2022 Howden Solyvent India Private Limited,Represented by its authorized representative,Mr.V.Kalyanaraman,No.147, Poonamallee High Road Village,Numbal Kancheepuram,Chennai – 600 077. Vs. The Income Tax Officer, Corp Ward 2(3),Income Tax Department,Chennai-Wanaparthy Block No.121,Mahatma Gandhi Road,Nungambakkam,Chennai – 600 034. ... Petitioner in both W.Ps. ... Respondent in both W.Ps. Prayer in W.P.No.5548 of 2022: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari to call for the records to the Impugned Order dated 17 February 2022 bearing Letter No.ITBA/RCV/F/17/2021-2022/1039856283(1) and the Notices dated 18 February 2022 bearing Notice No.ITBA/COM/F/17/2021-22/1039888560(1) and 23 February 2022 bearing Notice No.ITBA/COM/F/17/2021-22/1040033835(1) issued by the Respondent to the Hongkong and Shanghai W.P.Nos.5548 and 5554 of 2022 Banking Corporation and the Notice dated 24 February 2022 bearing Letter No.ITBA/COM/F/17/2021-22/1040083226(1) issued by the Respondent to the Petitioner. Prayer in W.P.No.5554 of 2022: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus to permit the petitioner to withdraw the undertaking dated 24 February 2022 issued to the Respondent. For Petitioner: M/s.E.N.Hareepriya (in both WPs.) For Respondent : Mr.B.Ramana Kumar Senior Standing Counsel (in both WPs.) COMMON ORDER By this common order both these writ petitions are being disposed of. Earlier an Assessment Order came to be passed on 21.04.2021 for the Assessment Year 2018-2019 under Section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The computation of the amount payable by the Petitioner for the Assessment Year was Rs.34,92,30,530/-. W.P.Nos.5548 and 5554 of 2022 2. It appears that for the other Assessment Years 2013-2014 and 2014-2015 also the Petitioner had suffered adverse Assessment Orders which were in appeal against which appeals were filed either before the CIT (Appeal) or ITAT. The Petitioner appears to have given an undertaking on 24.02.2022 to pay 20% of the amount due and payable in terms of the Circular of the Central Board of Direct Taxes for stating of all further proceedings pending disposal of the appeal. Details of undertaking given by the Petitioner are as under:- “This is with reference to the Undertaking of payment of arrears of taxes submitted by the following company on 24[th ]February 2022. M/S.HOWDEN SOLYVENT (INDIA) P LTD TLT BABCOCK INDIA P LTD (since merged with M/s.Howden Solyvent (India) P Ltd) You are required to adhere to the terms and conditions of the Undertaking dated 24.02.2022 submitted by you to the undersigned. You are directed to pay the balance of demand in equal monthly installments as under:- First Monthly installment on or before 10 March, 2022 – Rs.1,77,68,470/- Followed by monthly installment of Rs.1 Crore for the following 4 installments on or before 10[th] of the month. Failure to adhere to the date of payment of installment will result in coercive action for recovery of the taxes due.” 3. As far as Assessment Year 2018-2019 is concerned, Petitioner had also approached the authorities under Section 226(6) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 which was rejected vide proceedings dated 24.02.2022. These proceedings were subject matter of W.P.No.5548 of 2022. 4. It appears that for the Assessment Year 2018-2019, the Petitioner has paid a paltry amount of Rs.54,794/- only. The Petitioner cannot expect demand in equal monthly installments as under:- First Monthly installment on or before 10 March, 2022 – Rs.1,77,68,470/- Followed by monthly installment of Rs.1 Crore for the following 4 installments on or before 10[th] of the month. Failure to adhere to the date of payment of installment will result in coercive action for recovery of the taxes due.” 3. As far as Assessment Year 2018-2019 is concerned, Petitioner had also approached the authorities under Section 226(6) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 which was rejected vide proceedings dated 24.02.2022. These proceedings were subject matter of W.P.No.5548 of 2022. 4. It appears that for the Assessment Year 2018-2019, the Petitioner has paid a paltry amount of Rs.54,794/- only. The Petitioner cannot expect the appeal to be heard without mandatory pre-deposit of the amount as is required as per the Office Memorandum issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes issued from time to time. Unless the Petitioner pre-deposits the amount the Petitioner cannot expect any protection from recovery of tax dues confirmed against the Petitioner. 5. Under these circumstances, these Writ Petitions are dismissed. W.P.Nos.5548 and 5554 of 2022 However liberty is given to the Petitioner to move suitable application for waiver in terms of the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Principal Commissioner of Income Tax 5 and Others vs. M/s.LG Electronics India Private Limited, rendered in Civil Appeal.No.6850 of 2018. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed. 19.09.2024 Index : Yes/NoSpeaking/Non-speaking OrderNeutral Citation :Yes/Norgm C.SARAVANAN, J. rgm https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis____________Page No. 5 of 6 W.P.Nos.5548 and 5554 of 2022 To The Income Tax Officer, Corp Ward 2(3),Income Tax Department,Chennai-Wanaparthy Block No.121,Mahatma Gandhi Road,Nungambakkam,Chennai – 600 034. W.P.Nos.5548 and 5554 of 2022andW.M.P.Nos.5653, 5654, 5656 and 5659 of 2022 19.09.2024
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Defend a reassessment (Sec 148) notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan